some people spend a lot of money on tickets for sporting or cultural events?
is it a good thing or a bad thing?
It is true that the popularity of sports has been on the rise in the past few decades, new games have been invented as well. Some spend lavishly on these events and I do believe this is not a positive sign in the long run.
First and foremost, extravagant spending for sports leads to disputes and problems in families. This is because they become financially constraint as their budgets shrink. For instance, Formula 1 race tickets cost as much as half of monthly salary of an Azeri employee. Paying for these tickets can squeeze many families and they may not find money to sustain their families for the month, or they will have to stop doing other leisure activities. If people were price conscious, they would not fall into the trap of these sporting games.
Secondly, I would argue that paying extra for tickets do not add any value to the society as a whole. This is because the only side benefits are the managers and shareholders of these sports. For example, soccer clubs are owned by billionaires and their only motive is to make a profit in seasonal championships. Fans, however, enjoy a benefit in the short term but gains nothing valuable in the long run.
in conclusion, considering hefty prices of certain games or events, I would argue that it is not appropriate or worthy to spend more for these as there are no benefits after all.
- some people spend a lot of money on tickets for sporting or cultural events?is it a good thing or a bad thing? 100
- The world is becoming more complex, and the wars still exist across the whole world. Many countries to defend their sovereignty, draft not just male soldiers but also females. Some believe that women should be excluded from the service, and I do support t 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...s nothing valuable in the long run. in conclusion, considering hefty prices of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68619246862 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49629897088 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610878661088 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1769197821 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178668911351 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599942647571 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450759845893 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960848994432 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422648566831 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.