Some people like to spend their leisure time with their colleagues while others prefer to keep their private life separate from their work life. Is it a good thing to spend leisure time with colleague?
It is arguable if people should spend leisure time with their colleagues or not. Some people consider it a good idea, while others want to stay separated. This topic should be considered under different circumstances.
On the one hand, people who are supportive to this point of view may declare that spending free time with their colleagues more frequently could strengthen the relationship between them. Therefore, they could understand and cooperate with each other much better, and they could stick together to tackle difficult problems at work, so that they could be more efficient and productive in their jobs. This phenomenon is more common among colleagues who share similar ages, because they might have more common topics and interests to share with each other. If they spend more spare time together, their families, especially children, could become good friends, which is valuable to them.
On the other hand, some people prefer separating their personal lives from their work lives as it could mess up the relationship with their colleagues. This issue usually occurs between managers and subordinates. When they spend leisure time together, subordinates probably want to gain more trust and admiration from their managers, so that they might have potential opportunities to promote or increase salaries. At the same time, managers might also want to provide more chance to their subordinates whom they share a closer personal relationship with, whereas those subordinates might not be the most capable employees in the company.
To conclude, it is understandable to spend leisure time with our colleagues, but the balance between work and personal life with them should be measured appropriately. By this way, people can not only build a strong friendship with their colleagues, but also not jeopardize the work relationship between them.
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones is disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 78
- You would like to take a part time course at the university but don t have the money to do it Write a letter to an organization that supports students financially and asks for help In your letter describe your qualification and degree provide some details 78
- Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative development 67
- You use the local swimming pool often and during one of your visits you have encountered a problem Write a letter to the manager In your letter describe what the problem was tell what the swimming pool staff have done about it suggest your own solution to 81
- Your friend recently moved to the same town you live Please write a letter to invite your friend to go to the gym together In your letter describe why you go to this gym say what part of this gym you recommend explain why you think it is suitable for your 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3801369863 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77552594763 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534246575342 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9972565211 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.846153846 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440996084856 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178241161556 0.084324248473 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136991049537 0.0667982634062 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296276507524 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416098144128 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.