Some people tend to judge a person on the basis of first observation. Some people believe it takes a long time to know a person well. Which approach to knowing people do you think is better and why?
Meeting a person for the first time and judging a person may not be very correct in the very first instance. Some people believe in "First impression is the last impression". In my opinion, this is not entirely true. Judging a person on the first meeting itself could be wrong at times.
There are different kind of people in this world. Some persons are introverts and others extroverts. Some persons are simple-thinking and a few could have a complicated thinking process as well.
If you meet an introvert you cannot judge him properly in the first meeting. Whereas, it will be very easy to formulate an opinion about an extrovert. To know a person's thinking process it needs dialog and discussions on different topics. One can be very good in discussions on one topic whereas others can be proficient in discussions on some different topic. To have a comprehensive evaluation of a persons thought process, way of talking, depth of knowledge and social etiquette's, it is imperative to meet and judge on more than one occasions.
Therefore, to judge a person correctly, comprehensive dialog and positive communication is the key factor. The dialog with the person gives you an insight into the thought process of the person. Whereas meeting a person gives you time to read his facial expressions and body language. Meeting as well as maintaining a dialog is both part of positive communication. Therefore, it is very essential that in order to judge a person correctly a fair amount of meeting and discussions on various topics are undertaken.
- You recently started commuting to work by bicycle and discovered that there is a problem with bicycle parking near the building where you work. Write a letter to the building manager and say– Explain the reason for using a bicycle to commute.– What pr 84
- Your friend has a travel company and would like you to come and work with him.Write a letter replying to your friends offer. In your letter:explain what you know about your friends companychoose whether you accept or decline the offergive reasons for your 73
- You have recently started work in a new company.Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter explain why you changed jobs describe your newjob tell him/her your other news. 73
- Some people tend to judge a person on the basis of first observation Some people believe it takes a long time to know a person well Which approach to knowing people do you think is better and why 90
- You are studying for a qualification, and you would like some time off work to complete it.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter:Ask for some time off to complete a qualification.Suggest what you will do later at work if you have time off.Say how 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
... wrong at times. There are different kind of people in this world. Some persons a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...omplicated thinking process as well. If you meet an introvert you cannot judge ...
^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...udge him properly in the first meeting. Whereas, it will be very easy to formulate an o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, kind of, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01923076923 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05891605894 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496153846154 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0712571714 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7647058824 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2941176471 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305570765673 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103757936942 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628492295805 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208504670484 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687667913029 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.