Some people think that the advantages of advertising sports products through famous sports players outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Professional athletes have an undeniable influence on the purchasing decisions of their fans. However, despite product believability over the customers, this essay concurs that if sports person’s performance suffers than product’s image also gets down which outweighs its advantage.
On the one hand, this essay concedes that fan wants to adopt the aspects of the strong, active, athletic player. Therefore, they chase products endorsed by athletes. It could be argued that children embrace healthy habits from advertisements cast by famous sports person. To exemplify, Sachin Tendulkar, renowned cricketer, appears in the commercial of Boost (energy drink). Consequently, children often started consuming boost in their diet and eventually sales of the company was also escalated. On the other side, the downside is many sports celebrity promotes wrong products for the sake of money which can be harmful to the consumer such as Joseph Parker ( a famous Boxer) appeared in the ads of Burger King encouraging junk food.
However, although the upsides of casting famous sports tar are a real concern, this essay acknowledges that there are many more reasons to stop advertisements by athletes. Firstly, when athletes performance declines or he becomes involved in a scandal, the endorsed products can also suffer. For an instance, when Tiger Wood had his sex scandal in 2009, many of his sponsors dropped him as an endorser for fear that his negative image would reflect poorly on their products.
To conclude, although I admit that the audience seriously follows sports star and consider the product, bad reputation of athlete can damage sales of the product. Therefore, I agree that the disadvantage of an athletes endorsement of products outweighs the advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-04 | rekharastogi | 89 | view |
| 2018-11-16 | marosa | 78 | view |
- Some people believe all the wild animals should protect while others think only some animal need to be saved Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Many young people regularly change jobs over the years. What are the reasons for this ?Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ? 78
- With deforestation, urban development and illegal hunting, many animal species are becoming endangered as they lose their habitat and some are even threatened to the point of extinction.Do you think it is important to protect animals? What measures can be 78
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...bits from advertisements cast by famous sports person. To exemplify, Sachin Tendulkar,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ul to the consumer such as Joseph Parker a famous Boxer appeared in the ads of Bu...
^^
Line 6, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'athletes'' or 'athlete's'?
Suggestion: athletes'; athlete's
...re, I agree that the disadvantage of an athletes endorsement of products outweighs the a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47272727273 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90164045936 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7023321799 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177621859138 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627863955202 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536731276436 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113665270949 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333667754223 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.