Some people believe all the wild animals should protect while others think only some animal need to be saved.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Wildlife is a precious gift of God to this planet. While some feel that only a few wild animals should preserve. I agree with those who believe all wildlife species should protect as they are inevitable for improving the nation’s GDP.
On the one hand, it could be argued that the goal of species conservation needs to be aligned with the acceptance that a large number of animal will go extinct. Those who not support protecting entire wildlife say that both planet and humanity can probably survive or even thrive in a world with fewer species. Consequently, the species that we rely on for food and shelter are a tiny proportion of total biodiversity. To exemplify, human does not depend on polar bears for their survival, and even if their eradication has a domino effect that eventually affects us, nature will find a way to adapt.
However, I believe that there are more arguments to suggest that each and every wild animal should preserve. As wildlife also plays a salient role in improving the economy of a country which invites tourists from all across the globe to witness endemic and rare species through their offsprings for game safaris and animal tours. Although wild animals did not directly promote a country’s economy, the cost of tourist’s travel, local transportation, food accommodation – all indirectly helps to nation’s economy. Many countries are today, encouraging a myriad of wildlife tourism despite they have to go to an extent of creating artificial habitats. Singapore is one such prominent example where the government has taken unusual steps of maintaining wild animal habitat to boost tourism.
To conclude, though it is undeniable that humans are not dependent on certain wild creatures, to engender more revenue conservation of wild animals thoroughly is essential. Therefore, I believe all species should nurture without bias.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-09 | rekharastogi | 95 | view |
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
- Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire Do you agree or disagree Why 92
- Some people believe all the wild animals should protect while others think only some animal need to be saved Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Some people think that job satisfaction is more important than job security. Others think that people cannot expect to enjoy a job and having a permanent job is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... a precious gift of God to this planet. While some feel that only a few wild animals ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... to be aligned with the acceptance that a large number of animals will go extinct. Those who not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 771, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...taken unusual steps of maintaining wild animals habitat to boost tourism. To conclud...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20846905537 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90672402409 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615635179153 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8624638994 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.214285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260531613971 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929317154886 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990852052028 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167552369543 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744284830909 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.