Some people tell that to reduce traffic and pollution, the government should increase the tax on petrol (gasoline). Would advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Increasing congestion and pollution is a pressing issue for city dwellers. Some people feel rising fuel prices and tax can curb this issue. However, I still believe other renewable resources and better road design can outweigh the drawbacks of inflation of petrol prices.
On the one hand, I concede that growing petrol prices would mitigate traffic problems in short term. As people will switch to public transports and it will keep road congestion free from lots of vehicles. It could be argued that only rich people would not get affected by the elevation of taxes and petrol price, whereas other class of people will face difficulty. Moreover, daily commutations will rely on public transports which can even cause delay at their workplace. Nevertheless, using more mass transit can save the environment from pollution
.
However, although the upside of inflation of fuel price is a real concern, some group of people advocates that other renewable sources of energy should be encouraged such as electronic bikes, CNG vehicles and so on. Such green energy project should be supported by government and more research need be carried out in a field of bio-fuel and eco-friendly vehicles which will minimize pollution. Further, to avoid congestion emphasis should be given on well-planned road designs and high-level engineering of fly-overs, due to which travelers can save time and traffic jams will also be diminished. Also, expanding bridges and tunnels is a wise initiative than hiking petrol prices.
To conclude, although I admit that rising petrol or diesel price is sometimes essential, the pollution free transport and superior routing people receive from CNG vehicles and advanced engineering are invaluable. Therefore, I agree that the disadvantages of increasing fuel price outweigh the advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-25 | rekharastogi | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | rekharastogi | 78 | view |
- Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- With deforestation, urban development and illegal hunting, many animal species are becoming endangered as they lose their habitat and some are even threatened to the point of extinction.Do you think it is important to protect animals? What measures can be 78
- Tobacco is a kind of drug. People have been free to use it. Some people think that it should be illegal to use it compared with other drugs.To what extent do you agree or disagree? What is your opinion? 78
- Some people tell that to reduce traffic and pollution, the government should increase the tax on petrol (gasoline). Would advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Many young people regularly change jobs over the years. What are the reasons for this?Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Increasing congestion and pollution is a pressing issue for city dwellers. Some p...
^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...can save the environment from pollution . However, although the upside of inflat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39649122807 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79303885881 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.075102751 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.857142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219479386117 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731319317878 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495975236566 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129707333959 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010553249928 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.