Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is generally accepted that young volunteers contribute to a better society. While some believe that unpaid work is not as good as paid ones, I strongly agree that teenagers working for free will become excellent professionals due to character building, and the community will be more developed because the government will reduce its expenses.
Firstly, volunteering develops a sense of responsibility within teens. Owing to the fact that young people will learn how to work diligently and carefully, working without expecting nothing in return will develop character and ethics. As a result, the community will train hard-working professionals without thinking about income in the first place. To illustrate, a recent study from the University of Davis found that young volunteers from a local church were willing to work harder and more careful after graduation compared to the public. So it is clear that unpaid work is the foundation to develop a good professional.
Secondly, besides the professional and personal benefits, volunteers work on duties that the government cannot do by themselves. In other words, it is very expensive to support a community properly taking into account metrics such as economics, violence rate, education. Consequently, any additional help, such as volunteering, is welcome to help the local community. For example, I lived in a small city where volunteers were constantly taking care of baggers and homeless people and this simple activity reduced the local violence rate. It is evident that when people help each other without further estate costs, creates a more peaceful and harmonious society.
In conclusion, by working for free with the goal of developing the local community, teenagers will gain character, and society will benefit without depending too much on the government
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42807017544 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93529272257 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585964912281 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4717754449 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197686086605 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643907394126 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527408920903 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127706595525 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324262069796 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.