Over the past decade, university education system has become a publicly recognized debate in over the world. Although some people incline to the perspective that students should be forced to an absolutely required program with useful subjects in accordance with the future requirement, I support for the ideal that students should be learned what they are passionate about.
On the one hand, leaning follow a previously forced script get students have better opportunities to participating constructive activities such as studying solidly fundamental knowledge and better job prospects in the future. In fact, owing to having a solid knowledge will certainly help students not only learn higher level or advanced knowledge easier, but also opening change to get considerably praiseworthy acquisition such as inventions or rewards in his career. Besides, by taking part in learning subjects that relates to primarily useful fields such as science and technology, students are more likely to having more better chances for their long-term career because of its absolutely huge needs.
On the flip side, I completely incline to the opinion that studying what students love is play positively significant role for them in particular and for national education system in general. Firstly, students could have more absolutely positive motivation from class and school when they are learned their passion. Such teaching method will help students not only be sharpened their gifted talent, but also increasing their creative ability in the learning process. This will lead to help them achieve fruitful achievement early. For instance, if a student talented in composing music, it is unnecessary to learn mathematics or technologies since he need learn about musical theory and learn how to play instruments. In addition, sinking in their passion get students spent more time to focusing on their study. As a result, students will certainly shorten the university time, this will inevitable help them have more time to develop their occupation, hence, they could be obviously succeed quicker than others.
In conclusion, although a section of society opines that it is necessary to have an extremely obliged program for students at university. In my opinion, if university authorities could implement an acceptably suitable scheme in line with the desire of majority of students, the returns are highly adjustable.
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 89
- IELTS Task 1 - Tables give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 78
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 84
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 622, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...ogy, students are more likely to having more better chances for their long-term career beca...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48387096774 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84665107819 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577956989247 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4947232925 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.714285714 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22919192112 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724465275077 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650462129232 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132969161713 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714176677225 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.