Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Yesterday I read an article about entitling artists with the right to present their vision unrestricted. However, this leads one to wonder whether it is reasonable to provide them with this opportunity. This essay agrees with the idea of entitlement.
The first reason is that important issues in society can be reflected on their work of art. Problems in the public are difficult to reveal and understand, but with the ability of artists, it feasible to recognise them before they escalate into social crisis. By analyzing their work, governments could see what is happening in public and get concerned if the people are disappointed by something like a rise in prices or illegal actions by politicians.
Another reason for artists being given the right to express themselves freely is that the level of cultural development is dependant on freedom in art. Culture thrive and become rich comprehensively unless the artists are restricted in their ideas. Thus, if the governemnt is interested in looking culturally developed in the world, it should not limit their rights and let them develop to the full. For example, many european countries pride themselves for their culture, since they allow their artists to express their thoughts nearly with no limits.
However, some politicians claim that the government should restrict their right in some cases. This is because people in art occasionally go beyond moral norms. They may display sexual or violent images in their exhibitions and, therefore, negatively affect people's psychological well-being. For example, in Europe, artists may present nude sculptures or scenes of torture and execution from the Middle Ages in the public places. Despite this, these images are part of the world history, and there is no need to fixate on them as something negative. On the contrary. they show how people lived in the past and what mistakes they made so that the current generate can learn and void them in the future.
In conclusion, authorities should let artists express themselves limitlessly since it help develop socially and curturally.
- Nowadays for many people the Internet is replacing regular books. What do you think will happen in the future and what is your opinion? 61
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it a positive development while others think it is negative development.Discuss both points and give your own opinion 73
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 73
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society? 11
- Some people think that parents should give their children complete freedom. Others feel that parents should limit their children's freedom. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...at the level of cultural development is dependant on freedom in art. Culture thrive and b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their thoughts nearly with no limits. However, some politicians claim that the...
^^^
Line 7, column 568, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...as something negative. On the contrary. they show how people lived in the past and w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24702380952 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7622238501 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4732668282 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9444444444 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141469575974 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434308914529 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361320915865 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774561668776 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350633726404 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.