Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Humanity has been defying the law and committing crimes during the history. There is an assumption that if people make an offence, authorities should punish them as severe as possible to decrease a crime level. At the same time, some individuals suppose government ought to practice soft methods to control society. Although, all people are afraid of being prisoned, but I agree that alternative ways possess higher influence than prison.
On the one hand, a long imprisonment is the most efficient method to reduce crimes due to an offender is being deprived of liberty. Thereby, freedom of action and movement is the crucial human’s right, thus nobody desires to lose it. This is because imprisonment for criminals is regarded as procedure to protect citizen’s lives and discipline them. For instance, the crime level in China is one of the lowest because it has severe prison sentences and even death penalty. In other word, authorities ought to strictly punish culprits not only to reduce amount of crimes, but also to keep stability in the state.
However, I believe that soft ways of punishment such as the public scrutiny and work, fines and house arrest are appropriate for modern humane generation. Therefore, after an imprisonment the life of people is losing its sense due to this fact everyone deserves the second chance. It means that criminals are also the citizens with their own rights, so government should use its “soft power” to make guilty human’s lives less hard. For example, in Switzerland 65% of punishments are public work and fines and it possesses the lowest rate of crimes. Thus, soft methods of punishment are more effective than imprisonment because they have higher influence on criminals.
In conclusion, imprisonment is efficient, but I think that soft punishments because government should value both criminals and citizens’ rights.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-12 | Jatin sheoran | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | Jatin sheoran | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | Jatin sheoran | 56 | view |
| 2021-03-09 | Rehana Diwan | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-24 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 84 | view |
- Computers are being used more and more in education Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences Discuss both views 56
- Some people agree with spending lots of money on large wedding while others think it is a waste of money Discuss both views 88
- People are now living in a throwaway society where things are used for a short period of time and then thrown away What are the causes of this and what problems does it cause 67
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 73
- The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23762376238 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76523543825 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594059405941 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.2532850559 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.8 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146041004767 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475666567026 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431303359026 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899511239572 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483722345907 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.