“Some people think that children should begin their formal education at very early age and should spend most of their time on school studies. Others believe that young children should spend most of their time playing. Compare these two views.”
In the development of children, they need having childhood and education. So that, some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age and study all time. But, others consider that young children should playing more. Personally, I cling to the later. To support my views, I demonstrate three of my ideas as follow.
There is no doubt that people learn through their entire lives. When they were young, they learn how to speak, how to walk. learn everything about environment around. When they were six years old, they started go to school and met their teachers, friends, so they began contact social. And they grow up, they may take many lessons, many courses and more knowledge. The understanding of each child is increasingly enriched until they mature. We can study at all times, from house to school, then when we sitting on the bus. As we can be seen that studying is never end, it’s immense and endless.
It is undeniable fact that children who begin their education early will have more knowledge and skills. They can contact with informations soon, so they are more ability to acquire and use it in many situations. Take Science as an example, kids make enquiries about the Earth, climate, they will have a sense to protect environment, recycle the garbage, plant trees. This is helpful. Their character are more confident, speak fluently and smart brain.
On the other hand, children are more likely to given in to peer pressure when they learn too much. It can be heath problems such as eye-strain, stress, work-shy. Not only do they have lessons on school studies, but they also receive a huge fund of knowledge when they play more. The idea may be fully support by evidence that puzzle toys, the kids could think of installing the houses, cars, plants and characters. The benefit of this is not small, they can develop their brains, intelligence, feeling sensitive.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, I think children should spend most of their time playing. Studying from playing is better than being forced learning. It’s a wonderful method for children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-15 | buingocanh19 | 92 | view |
- “Some people enjoy change and they look forward to new experiences. Others like their lives to stay the same and they do not change their usual habits. Compare these two approaches. Which approach you prefer? Explain why.” 56
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at very early age and should spend most of their time on school studies Others believe that young children should spend most of their time playing Compare these two views 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
... views, I demonstrate three of my ideas as follow. There is no doubt that people learn...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Learn
..., they learn how to speak, how to walk. learn everything about environment around. Wh...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'ended'.
Suggestion: ended
...s we can be seen that studying is never end, it's immense and endless. It i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, then, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95833333333 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48346227605 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1179639683 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.6538461538 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8461538462 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262853789176 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746048751336 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114410779238 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185458067792 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132991102948 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 50.2224549098 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.3001002004 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.