SOME PEOPLE THINK GOVERNMENTS SHOULD TAKE MEASURE TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF ITS CITIZENS OTHER THINK IT MUST BE MANAGED BY INDIVIDUALS. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION
People have different views about who is in charge of taking measures to enhance the health of residents. Some people think it is the government's liability to improve residents' health while others deem that we should take care of it ourselves. While I accept that the state should take measures to ensure public health, I personally believe that it is more compatible for us to do it individually.
On the one hand, governments can do numerous things to keep their citizens healthy. For one, they need and are able to impose a ban on factors that are detrimental to humans. For example, cigarettes, alcohol or drugs. Secondly, they can help to broaden the trend of adopting a healthier lifestyle by creating more TV advertisements, posters, programs or even some events. Therefore, the citizens are able to acquire knowledge about living healthily hence raise their awareness about avoiding harmful factors to health, leading to a better living lifestyle. Moreover, the government can reduce healthcare services price so that people who have low incomes can reach it easily.
On the other hand, it is natural and reasonable for humans to care of themselves on their own. The first reason for it is governments are impossible to take care of each individual since there are millions of people in a country. Moreover, although lots of solutions are being implemented by governments to lead humans to a healthier lifestyle, some people are still reluctant or not able to give themselves away from harmful practices and food. For instance, busy people do not have time to go exercise often or consider about choosing healthy food. Hence, they tend to eat junk food to finish their meal fastly, which does not help them to stay in shape, or can even lead to health issues. Therefore, those solutions or TV ads, programs as mentioned are useless and the best way is people must pay more attention to their health.
In a nutshell, I reaffirm that although governments are able to do lots of things to improve the residents's health, it is more possible and reasonable for each individual to take care of themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-23 | phuonganhdoan04 | 73 | view |
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household tasks equallym To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 84
- the bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... residents. Some people think it is the governments liability to improve residents health w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, even so, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94662921348 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74593701993 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511235955056 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5588233743 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261039515479 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840162167171 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799640577149 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168139264584 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931876709807 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.