Some people think that it is necessary to travel to other places to learn about other cultures. Others say that books, films and the Internet can be used as a source of information about different cultures.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
We live in a multifaceted society that has its own cultural and traditional values. Those different cultures lure people to visit different places in order to learn more which is laudable, but others believe that we live in a digital world and such information is accessible through paper and print media and travel documentaries. I will shed some light on both views before presenting an opinion.
People believe that culture can be best understood when one physically visit that place. Proponents of this viewpoint argue that films and books do not cover all aspects and often shows only positive attributes. Cultural values and traditions are best analysed when we face them and participate in their festivals, religious gatherings, weddings and other events. Moreover, travel documentaries give us limited information and physical presence in instrumental to observe and understand their emotion, feelings and sentiments. For instance, Malay culture is rich in folk music, artworks, poetry, festivals , but there are some hidden traits like their disliking for non-Malay which is not mentioned in any book or shown in films. Furthermore, one can truly admire and appreciate culture when they mingle with them.
On the contrary, books were written by authors that visited those places or heard about them from others. Moreover, the internet is a massive repository of digital content in the form of textual and visual information. For instance, Indian culture got popular in western countries due to different Bollywood movies. Furthermore, documentary videos and movies are a good source of information as they cover different aspects of a culture in visual form and one gets absorbed in it while watching.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned provides plausible arguments over both view point. However, I personally believe that one should travel to explore and kerb their passion for learning different cultures as physical presence cannot match the virtual information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-11 | vipanbhatia | 78 | view |
- One of your friends invited you for a meal with his her family in their home You enjoyed the meal and had been happy to be introduced to his her family Write a letter to your friend In your letter thank your friend and say that you enjoyed the meal say wh 73
- Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher pollution. Whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both the views and give opinion 93
- You and your family are living in a rented accommodation in an English speaking country. You are not satisfied with the condition of some of the furniture.Write a letter to the landlord. In your letterintroduce yourselfexplain what is wrong with the furni 78
- One of your friends has asked you to be a partner in his new business.Write a letter to reply to your friend's offer. In your lettergive your opinion of your friend's business ideatell him whether or not you have decided to accept his offerand explain you 78
- Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher pollution. Whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both the views and give opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... folk music, artworks, poetry, festivals , but there are some hidden traits like t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4657980456 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88775659199 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628664495114 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9899336471 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.866666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189655771072 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550276442595 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400627297774 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107582713264 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322133041677 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.