Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Whether the styles of newly built houses should be the same as old buildings in local villages or should be different from traditional construction have recently sparked a heated debate. I will discuss both of these views and represent my personal opinion in the following piece of writing.
On the one hand, ample justifications are listed for modern structures to follow the same design in a particular place. At the beginning, similar houses approvingly promote the preservation of residential culture. They boost not only the domestic tourists but the foreign travellers as well which consequently offer a large volume of jobs for local residents such as tour guide. To illustrate, Hoi An is by far the most ancient city in Vietnam where citizens are encouraged to preserve their old houses and design their new home in the traditional ways. Due to that feature, Hoi An greatly attracts the widest range of visitors. Besides, since houses share a common construction, the sense of community is significantly improved. Should every house looks alike, other people are much more confident to socialize. Furthermore, a row of identical houses ensures safety for inhabitants and neighbors.
On the other hand, the authority should allow the residents to build their own home in their own interest. Firstly, unique styles reflect various functions and the owners’ characteristics. Take a firm as an example, it is common knowledge that companies do possess high buildings whereas ancient homes merely have three or five floors. Moreover, regarding the price, building a house almost relies on the budget of its owner, let alone the cost of materials for old houses such as wood are extremely prohibitive. Secondly, dissimilar houses contribute to the diverse image of one area. They reduce the boredom of similarity and sometimes bring about new private and external investment in that area. Reputable investors invariably invest in a potential place rather than old-fashioned location.
To conclude, despite aforementioned benefits of the same structures in one area, I firmly assume that it is people’s freedom to build their houses in their own desire.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-19 | ngangiang2809 | 89 | view |
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree Write at least 250 words 63
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- Write a 250 300 word essay about causes and effects of eating fast food too much 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ss both of these views and represent my personal opinion in the following piece of writing. On...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cient city in Vietnam where citizens are encouraged to preserve their old houses ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, as to, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29941860465 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92810923438 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622093023256 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2785840908 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.277777778 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416978291426 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104449312636 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828852794813 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253791275254 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575213238316 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.