Some people think that not all criminals should be kept in prison. Some criminals should do unpaid work to help other people in the community. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Albeit the fact that people convicted of crime are a matter of security threat to the citizenry, if they are left free from prisons. Certain section of society believe that they must be better utilized in social activities. Whereas, others have contrasting views, opposing such phenomenon. In my opinion, people convicted of minor crimes should only be opted for such services, that too only after scrutinizing each case by specially appointed jury.
Firstly, crimes are of different severities ranging from grave ones such as felony, burglary, and murder to minor ones like theft, pickpocketing, and domestic quarrel. Therefore, minor criminals can be corrected and utilized in social cause. Secondly, senior citizens who have already passed ample time in prison and are guilty of their crimes can be allowed to socialize by releasing them on parole. Thirdly, prisons must conduct certain rehabilitation centers in the form of social and religious seminars giving potential candidates a chance to self-correct their misdeeds. However, only those candidates who have committed socially acceptable crime must be enrolled in such groups. However, to ensure avoiding loop-hole in such a system, prisons must appoint a jury responsible of deciding each individual case. Furthermore, even after releasing on parole, a strict follow-up and surveillance on them is a must.
On the other hand, criminals convicted of heinous crimes such as, mass killing, terrorism etc. are like virus to the society and are unfit to benefit the society in any means. Therefore, they should be kept where they belong to, that is in jails. More importantly, even if they pretend to be corrected, there is no guarantee that they truly have changed. Thus, risk on society is always high in such cases.
To conclude, releasing criminals to carry voluntary work is a good idea, but it is extremely important at the same time to ensure only those candidates who are emotionally fit and socially acceptable are choosen. To do so, proper filtering by specially appointed jury under governmental guidelines is a must.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-16 | Alyona | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-13 | hari.kumar222 | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-08 | David66 | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | sapnajumani | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-20 | SATPREET SINGH | 78 | view |
- Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art, which helps to improve the quality of people’s lives. However, governments should spend money on other things rather than art. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 84
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities 79
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. 67
- Learning english at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English. Should we try to ensure the survival of local l 67
- Women can do everything that men can and they even do it better They also can do many things that men cannot But it is a fact that their work is not appreciated as much as men s although they have to sacrifice a lot for their family and career It is said 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, whereas, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28528528529 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81902178437 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0156804599 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128438475203 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039686327646 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337968364761 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809340543994 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176925923342 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.