Some people think that only staff who worked in the company for a long time should be promoted to higher positions.
What is your opinion on this?
Give reasons and relevant examples for your answer
Defining the criterion for filling a job vacancy, especially for the high positions, has been highly controversial in recent years. Some people believe these positions should only be filled using the staff who worked for the company. In this essay, I will examine this view and discuss why I strongly believe it mainly depends on the company’s type of work.
When there is a need to fill a job position, especially for hard-to-fill positions, one good strategy is to promote the staff who are working for the company. This is a highly effective strategy because of some reason. First, they are entirely familiar with company procedures. So there is no learning curve for them regarding how the system works. Secondly, they are familiar enough with the people they suppose to work with. So they know how to resolve conflicts especially when the troubles flare up. Although these are very important criteria to fill a job position, for some jobs they are not enough.
Although knowing the company routines and people are so important, but for some jobs, especially the knowledge-based ones, they can’t be the main criterion. In these kinds of jobs, the most important criterion is how well the candidate knows about the technical aspects of the position and how creative he/she can be in it. For example, it’s perfectly obvious that if you have an IT company, Bill Gates is a better fit as a CEO rather than most of the working staff.
By way of conclusion, I once reaffirm my opinion that although it’s a good strategy to use current staff to fill higher positions, it’s not enough for some jobs. It totally depends on the job type. But I think it’s safe to say that if you have, at the same time, a suitably qualified candidate inside your company and another one outside, the best choice is the first one.
- Some people think that only staff who worked in the company for a long time should be promoted to higher positions.What is your opinion on this?Give reasons and relevant examples for your answer 73
- Some people believe that a good way to reduce crime is longer sentences.Others may think there are alternative ways to this problem.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...os;s perfectly obvious that if you have an IT company, Bill Gates is a better fit as ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...erfectly obvious that if you have an IT company, Bill Gates is a better fit as a CEO ra...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89171974522 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65418682388 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550955414013 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6780513485 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313893331949 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986689987395 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774186586618 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192524173661 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558418245053 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.