Some people think residents should keep their streets clean and tidy while others say it is government’s responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The significance of streets which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others disagree. However, a few numbers of individuals believe that population should concern in about roads to keep spin and span when others feel that it is only authorities’ duty. In my opinion, this is a main rule for everyone to clean roads always which is more logical. This essay will elaborate both aspects along with examples in the looming paragraphs.
To begin with many public, maintain the motor way as own assets and try to make tidy. Moreover, a fair road provides to people as healthier as well as wealthier. To take an example, the way where are dirtiness is absent, Individuals can take fresh air along with keep fit body. For that reason, they can shine in career with better economic sectors. For instance, most of the European success in work life to maintain a healthy life and through saving the country's assets such as streets. Thus, it is clear that everyone should be focused on nation's roads as own asset instead of government's duty.
On the other hand, governments should provide all of the responsibilities to keep clean the roads. Moreover, population has a right to receive better service from nations. According to this service, authorities should organize teams for cleaning in every area of countries and they should keep clean and tidy roads from morning to night time . Hence, every government should maintain all responsibilities for residents.
To sum up, according to the arguments one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of streets are instrumental indeed. However, every people should keep clean roads and highway instead of authorities.
- The chart shows the percentage of Irish language speaker in five provinces in five years
- It seems that many companies today are becoming much more concerned with profit than with the happiness of workers How could companies take better care of their workers in the future Give reasons to your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
- Mobile phones and the Internet have made it easy to stay in contact with other people However as a lot of time is spent using telephones and computers there is less face to face contact and direct communication Is the growing use of communications technol 61
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- A new shopping center is going to open in your town at present nobody knows what kind of shops or facilities are going to be provided for customers what shops and facilities would you like to see made available to the shopping public give reasons for your 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...keep spin and span when others feel that it is only authorities’ duty. In my opin...
^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ir road provides to people as healthier as well as wealthier. To take an example, ...
^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... other hand, governments should provide all of the responsibilities to keep clean the road...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd tidy roads from morning to night time . Hence, every government should maintain...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77421506511 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562937062937 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7840106411 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223946753487 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07334571196 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731215725607 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139859072519 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656055881609 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.