Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety.
These days, we visualize large number of traffic accidents. These accidents sometimes ruin the complete family or may leave a person nearly dead or paralyzed for rest of the life. It is commonly believed by many that there should be strict punishments for traffic rule offenders while some other believe that there are many other effective measures that could supervise the road safety. In this essay, I will discuss both these views and present my own opinion.
It is undeniable that despite of several warning messages and awareness programs, these traffic rule offenders do not follow the traffic laws. There should be hard punishment such as withholding their licence or few days of imprisonment for those who do not obey the traffic rules. Such punishments would be a lesson to others so that they do no imitate the such offences. Once the rule-breakers are punished badly by the law-enforcing agencies they would never try to repeat those offences. Hence, it will improve road safety to some extent.
On the other side, some other precausive measures by the government could be an effective solution to mitigate road accidents. Firstly and fore-mostly, there should be better infrastructure in the form of well-maintained roads, fixed traffic light signals and proper sign boards. Along with that awareness programs that demonstrate the after-accident life experience of real road accident victims, the benefits of using safety gadgets and following road rules could work beneficially to improve road safety.
In my opinion, we could not force anybody to abide by the rules, it mostly comes by self-consciousness and this could be brought through awareness programs instead of strict punishments. I believe that taking precausive actions such as well-constructed roads, well-defined traffic rules and better infrastructure would be much superior that deciding strict punishments for rule-breakers.
To conclude, traffic rule offenders could be found everywhere around the globe. Taking strict action against them could be solution but not only. In my opinion, there are various other effective ways to control road accidents and improve road safety including awareness programs and well-designed infrastructure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-20 | harmankaur | 73 | view |
- You have a penfriend living in another country and he/she is curious to know about the major news items in your country .Briefly describe ONE news story that has been on TV,on the radio, or in the newspapers in your country , and explain why people are in 78
- Your local newspaper is offering an award for people who have helped the community. Write a letter to the newspaper editor. In your lettersuggest someone you think should receive the awarddescribe what the person does to help the communitysuggest an award 87
- Write a letter to a friend of yours with whom you had a quarrel recently 87
- With an increasing population communication via the internet and text messaging face to face communication will become a thing of the past. To what extend do you agree? 84
- Some people believe school children should be given multiple short vacations, while others believe they should get one long vacation. Give the advantages of both and express your own point of view. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t they do no imitate the such offences. Once the rule-breakers are punished badly by...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, well, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49418604651 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00512789616 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4036013456 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.176470588 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353620401888 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115313304892 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103568724437 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208920809154 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531027863866 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.