Some people think that technology has made our life too complex. However, other people think that it has made our life easier. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Scientists, developers, and inventors were always looking for a way to make our life easier. Some people think that new scientific achievements change our life on the worst side. I am convinced there is definitely some crucial advantages that people should accept.
On the one hand, a hundred years ago people could not imagine contact with each other over great distances. Nowadays, every single person has a cellphone that makes life much better in different paths. There is a lot of the advantages of the smartphone, but the main feature is the wireless connection to the Internet and keep contact on social networks or messengers with anyone who you care about. If people had not used gadgets, it would have been complicated to communicate with each other from any place on the planet. In other words, techs is the opportunity to make life more comfortable and enjoyable.
On the other hand, I side with the people believe that developments such as artificial intelligence, voice control, and the smart house will bring in life new difficulties. Every device in your house of the future that operates by electricity need to be connected to the power outlet. The more gadgets in your daily basis, the more wires on the floor that will definitely prevent you one day. Buying a wireless charger brings more problems than the wires. British scientists approved that radio waves from wireless chargers and voice assistant negatively affect human health. This is why people should accurately choose every piece of automation in their homes.
In conclusion, even though the part of modern technologies have a negative part people cannot resist the rapid growth of new features that provide to benefit in life.
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatres is a waste of money Government must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatres is a waste of money Government must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatres is a waste of money Government must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatres is a waste of money Government must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that technology has made our life too complex However other people think that it has made our life easier Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05300353357 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65965325692 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618374558304 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6365937281 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249958710008 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786901973868 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767699816277 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155673512007 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920554384997 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.