Indubitably, the environmental degradation rates have witnessed an unprecedented hike since few decades. Few proponents argue that common personages can lend their helping hand in mitigating environment deterioration; while, other opponents condemn this and bolster that regimes and business enterprises solely can tackle this. My views regarding the aforementioned and conflicting views will be enunciated in forthcoming paragraphs along with my plausible opinion.
Ostensibly, the small initiatives taken right from the grass root level can prove to be fruitful ones. First and foremost, dwellers must use the public transit system, which will lower down the emissions. Apart from this, the concept of car pooling and using bicycles for shorter distances must be brought into action. Furthermore, the consumerism and throw away culture has gained greater momentum in this neoteric epoch, which needs to be addressed at the soonest. Adding details to this, the dependence on industries must be alleviated, implement the ideology of 3-R, and practise afforestation.
Contrarily, the legislative bodies and giant companies, being financially prosperous and equipped with wide array of rights, can bring global change with greater ease and efficiency. In regards to government, they can enact and implement stringent laws to revitalise the environment. To cite an epitome- 192 countries across the globe were able to cut-off the carbon emissions due to certain rules laid during international treaty named as Kyoto Protocol held in 1997, Japan. Besides this, the companies must curtail their disposal into water bodies by installing water treatment plants, air filters in the factories.
In my perspective, the individuals can curb such problem more effectively as their little deeds can suppress the environment degradation.
To conclude, cohesive efforts must be taken by individuals, government and business firms to make this Earth a heavenly place to live on. All these forces must go hand in hand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...hange with greater ease and efficiency. In regards to government, they can enact and implemen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, regarding, so, well, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67880794702 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99487340281 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695364238411 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9042344453 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122878773416 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362420820872 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475362571246 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734324659158 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395761791553 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.