Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. Do the benefits of this outweigh the drawbacks?
It has been argued that one single language for entire globe should be created and applied for international interaction. I believe the benefits of inventing a single language for the all world are easily overweighed by the drawbacks.
On the positive side, phenomenon of one globe one language would be fruitful to diminish the communication gap among people. While interacting with each other, people from various nationalities encounter difficulties as they cannot understand the language of other countries. If a single language for entire world would be implemented, it would be proved convenient for everybody during the conversation. With no language barrier, individuals can freely roam around the world, explore career opportunities in different nations. Moreover, in order to strengthen the feeling of uniformity, one language should be spoken by one and all so that people could feel part of a common globe.
On the negative side, I think the idea of implementation of a language for the every nation seems an unrealistic. Developing a new language and teaching it to the whole mankind is not an easy task as it could take 100 of years to invent and teach. The countries, which are considered as under privileged, will not be able to afford the expenses of spreading a new language to its citizens. Geriatrics will find it inconvenient to grasp new language. Additionally, the world is characterised by its diversification and imposing one language can kill the diversity as well as uniqueness of the world. A wide variety of dialects, for instance, will disappear after single language implementation. Hence, it is apparent how the view of single language in all the countries could possibly pose a threat to entire world.
In conclusion, I believe the benefits, fraternity among humans and convenient to explore entire world, of one language for world are easily outstripped by the drawbacks of cultural shock, time as well as expenses it entails.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | Angrej Singh | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your opinion 76
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. Do the benefits of this outweigh the problems? 73
- You went to the local hospital's emergency department with your young child who had severe stomach pains. You had to wait for almost four hours before your daughter was treated by a doctor and while you were waiting, you were constantly ignored by th 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- You have arranged a meeting with a business partner Unfortunately you have to change the arrangements Write a letter to your partner Explain the new arrangements Apologise for the changes Explain the reasons why the changes were needed 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...f a language for the every nation seems an unrealistic. Developing a new language and teaching...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 770, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...of single language in all the countries could possibly pose a threat to entire world. In con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21451104101 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13930373417 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529968454259 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1542904414 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226685100346 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827943874805 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469764549804 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150676749637 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587843185307 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.