Some people thinks that government should increase tax on unhealthy food to encourage people to start eating healthy. Do you agree or disagree
it is thought by few that if authorities impose higher tax on junk food, it will motivate masses to consume food which is nutritious and beneficial for health. I assert that it may reduce the consumption to some extend but not that much effective way to guide the public about their eating habits.
To begin with, increase in the price of fast food will only affect the weaker segment of society. In other words only poverty drive people will think to alternate their dishes because of this price increase. The affluent class will continue to go with their prefered choice, this means only segment of society will be effected because of high price. Therefore, it is not the best solution to the problem. Rather than accelerating the taxes government should try to teach the public about the adverse consequences of eating unhealthy food by organising educational campaigns.
Moving further, the predominant reason for this trend of preferring ready to cook food is lack of time. These days both male and female are working and career oriented and do not have spare time to cook their own meal, so they opt to packed no matter at what price. However, state can change the eating habit of public by making healthy food easily available so that it can convenient to opt for freshly cooked meals. Even though, if price of healthy meals will be high people will definitely choose them over unhealthy diets.
In conclusion, unequivocally putting higher tax may bring some changes in the eating pattern and preference of the customer but not that much. educating people about the health benefit of eating healthy food and making it easily available will be a better way to bring the change
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-23 | geetuvirk | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-07 | Shraddanand | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-29 | vadhrahvirk | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-04 | ECAJOA | 79 | view |
| 2020-03-02 | guojunliang | 84 | view |
- Nowadays a few people take their family with them to abroad whenever they go for a business trip What are the advantages and disadvantages on them and on their family 90
- The number of people getting higher who wearing fashionable clothes Is it good or bad situation 73
- You are planning a 2 day work training outside your city next month Write a letter to the manager of the hotel regarding accommodation arrangement for your visit In your letter you should tell introduce yourself and your company ask availability of their 89
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones is disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 78
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from you house flat Write a letter to your neighbours In your letter 1 Explain the reasons for the noise 2 Apologise 3 Describe what action you will take 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is thought by few that if authorities i...
^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...t it may reduce the consumption to some extend but not that much effective way to guid...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 435, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'taxes'' or 'tax's', 'taxis's'?
Suggestion: taxes'; tax's; taxis's
...e problem. Rather than accelerating the taxes government should try to teach the publ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Educating
...ence of the customer but not that much. educating people about the health benefit of eati...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88194444444 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43384697775 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579861111111 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1229666525 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.153846154 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230610949029 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781796632456 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551642627031 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138585178211 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285243838971 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.