Some people use technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing a doctor. Why this is so? It is positive or negative development according to you?
It has been observed that some people instead of visiting a professional practitioner, take health related advice from an advanced technology, such as the internet. This essay will analyze what are the prime motives behind this approach and would agree that this is a negative development to deal with the ailment.
There are various reasons behind consulting online-website to deal with health issues. Firstly, it is immensely time saving. Nowadays, pupils are leading a hectic life, and they do not have time to visit the consultant and wait in long queues. Instead, they just login on a website which prescribe them a drug, according to the disease searched. Secondly, hefty fees of consultants deter patients from visiting the doctors frequently. On the other hand, advice provided by online medium is mostly free of charge and instant. For instance, when I had common cold, I logged in on a reliable website and read recommended medicines.
However, this essay agrees that it is a negative approach to deal with a major disease. To begin with, information provided by internet on treating diseases is often misleading and conflicting. Thus, medicine referred by anonymous might lead to a plethora of side effects, and may worsen the medical condition of the patient. Online prescriptions are only reliable for minor ailments, such as cold, however, for precarious diseases like cancer, one must consult the specialist. Instead to comprising our health, we must visit professional who had years of experience diagnosing and treating life threatening diseases.
In conclusion, although choosing online resources over medical practitioner is convenient, time saving and less costly, I believe that this method has more demerits than the benefits it provides.
- Some people use technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing a doctor. Why this is so? It is positive or negative development according to you? 89
- some people think that family has the most important influence on children's development. while others believe that factored such as TV friends music and books have more significant impact. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Nowadays people usually retire at the age of 60 or 65, but some want to keep working as long as they can. Is this a positive or a negative development? Give you own opinion and relevant examples. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ancer, one must consult the specialist. Instead to comprising our health, we must visit...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37769784173 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8831333558 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640287769784 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9705148767 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146670600329 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404743722521 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401335092371 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918240199037 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518193597205 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.