Some people want the government to spend money in looking for life on other planets, but others think it is a waste of public money as there are many problems need to be solved on the earth.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There are many debates on whether the government should invest money in searching lives in space or not. People demand on searching lives on other planets believe this could provide a solution to overpopulation on earth. People disagree with such action believe this is a waste of money and we should better use those money on problems that are happening on earth. I partly agree with both opinions and I believe they are not mutually exclusive.
Earth is facing severe problems from overpopulation and so far we do not have an applicable solution to it. If this situation continues, these problems could lead humankind to extinction. If there are lives on other planets, humans could have an alternative choice beside earth. People can migrate to the new planet and the population pressure on earth can be reduced. Therefore, spending money on finding life on another planet would be worthy and useful for humankind in general.
Some people, however, suggest focussing on issues that are happening on the earth. Many problems we are having now such as human trafficking need to be solved sooner or later. With more financial help from an authority, these problems could be improved dramatically. For example, if we can provide complimentary childcare, there would be less children being left unprotected while their parents are unavailable. As a result, there would be less chances for ill-intended people to conduct human trafficking.
In my opinion, both opinions have their own advantages and they can co-exist. Money spent on looking for a new life can be a good investment for the whole humankind. At the same time, there are many issues on the earth that demand money to be solved as soon as possible. However, if we divide the money wisely, both purposes can be fulfilled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
...waste of money and we should better use those money on problems that are happening on earth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun children is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...complimentary childcare, there would be less children being left unprotected while t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...navailable. As a result, there would be less chances for ill-intended people to cond...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, in general, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0404040404 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73519653665 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.0985227637 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.1666666667 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359306359012 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108136093287 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498983883788 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216471834003 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455797802831 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.