Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Most individuals have preferred to work in one company for their whole working life; whilst their counterparts assert that working for various organizations is a better option. In my opinion, I believe that although it has some benefits for an employee to stay in the same firm, yet switching to different jobs could be helpful to gain more opportunities in life.
People, on the one hand, believe that working in the same company is advantageous as it increases the skill set of an employee. People who have been sticking to one profession could become experienced and skillful, with regards to their work-related responsibilities. Therefore, in the long run, they will not only gain expertise but also get increments for their work. Take veteran government officials for example, even though their qualifications are lower than that of newly appointed staff members, but their intelligence and skillful hand for doing every task is unbeatable. With the period of time, they have gained a lot of knowledge in their fields.
However, people, on the other hand, opined that shifting to various professions is beneficial, as it provides unlimited career options along with excitement. In other words, if an individual has changed his/her job, after a short interval; he would definitely encounter various opportunities in the path. Also, switching to a new organization could reduce boredom in life by adding a sense of thrill. For instance, the freshers at ad-hoc basis, tend to change their jobs in between, as they have not always liked to confine themselves in the same place. Nevertheless, they like to accept new challenges, which can boost their morale and skills.
In conclusion, while I agree that working your whole life for the same company has some pros, the value of numerous golden chances during the shift to another profession is always worth more. It has been categorically mentioned that sticking to one job means to become a valuable asset; however, it is more fruitful if an employee searches for more career advancements to earn a good skill set.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-24 | atulmovie29 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-14 | Emjay | 84 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 67
- Some people believe that children should not be given homework every day, while others believe that they must get homework every day in order to succeed at school. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- You are not satisfied with your recent trip Write a letter to the travel agency In your letter Where and when you went on holiday What has happened What do you want from the organization 74
- The internet contains a lot of information however sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong Do you agree or disagree with the statement 87
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole Discuss this view and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...oing every task is unbeatable. With the period of time, they have gained a lot of knowledge in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12684365782 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89161088197 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58407079646 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1266918149 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353079058789 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114043941286 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10314148915 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226488655195 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122142090161 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.