Some say people working in different job roles should get different amount of holiday. Do you agree or disagree
As employment plays an imperative part in our lives, it has been suggested that, there should be holidays for employees, not only to get relaxed, but also to spend some quality time with family. Many individuals state that the number of holidays should vary on the basis of the job level. I strongly agree with this assertion, moreover, it is a positive trend that will help people working on different roles.
Even though, most of the companies have work-off policies for workers, it will be completely preposterous, if they do not have adequate amount of time to get rid of stress. Most of the companies are working twenty four-by-seven, so that they can able to reach their targets in speed, if the labors in these companies are not having enough time to rejuvenate, it will be very difficult to keep-up their work, as a consequence, they cannot deliver quality product. Hence the results of not having good holidays can be devastating.
Nevertheless, there are different roles in an organization to perform tasks; each of them depends upon the responsibility of the work, so it the vacation given to a person should be on par with the position of the employee. For example, it is obvious that an IT specialist need active thinking to design algorithms and code them, therefore, they need good rest to relax their mind to produce good product, on the flip side a manufacturer will have to blindly follow the steps they have been assigned to, so they do not need much aptitude thinking to provide results. Thus, having adequate amount of leaves arenecessary.
Despite the product of the company, there are many people who are working under different roles to produce the outcome, but leaves with respect to roles are debatable. In think the vacation should be on the basis of responsibility they are assigned to. I think in near future all companies will incorporate the level base leave system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-10 | javaduddupudi | 73 | view |
- Some people say that economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world. Others say that economic growth should be stopped immediately to stop damaging the environment. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Some people encourage Development of factory farming and the scientific creation of fruits and vegetables in agriculture but others oppose these developments Discuss both views and give your own opinion 74
- Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environmental conservation. Discuss both views and give you 91
- Shopping has become a favorite pastime among young people. Why do you think it is like that, and do you think they must be encouraged to do other things rather than shopping? 61
- International marketing is sometimes seen as invasive and an intrusion into the country in question. Others argue that it is a necessary and economical form of education in addition to spreading ideas, language and culture. Discuss both sides and give you 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e, they cannot deliver quality product. Hence the results of not having good holidays...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...ployee. For example, it is obvious that an IT specialist need active thinking to desi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89814814815 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73950832874 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.3208717625 49.4020404114 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229633056403 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889448972105 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645987780509 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147231285383 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659715646889 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.