In some schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects (e.g. literature), and boys tend to choose science subjects (e.g. physics). Why do you think this is so? Should this tendency be changed?
It is unacceptable that nowadays, most of the people general opinion about females who can capable to study literature only but men can handle both specially in science subjects. My point of view, totally disagree this matter and women has propensity to win to take any subjects that I am going to describe below.
To begin with, some of them still they believe that women has a tendency to manage their family and they have a plethora of responsibilities in family lifestyle, in this scenario, which they can not take it up heavy subject. In addition to that, Men has to earn more money that their responsibilities to manage family commitment for financial wise. However, some people think that men can easily learn mathematics and science rather than women in order to this traditional mentality women are generally prefer with literature. For instance, In India, there are 44% women who preferred literature to look for a teacher job or college lecturer.
On the other hand, women has empowered who can achieve anything and they can do tremendous work what men are doing. Actual trend of gender discrimination even in education should be stopped. Good news is that women in many engineering and technology subjects are already occupying half of the seats in many prestigious universities. Thus the day is not far away when the social custom or emotional aversion of parents would accept that their daughters are just as talented as their sons are in any areas including science. For instance, great scientist like Kalpana Chawla and Marie Curie both has proved that women can achieve in any technology and any subjects.
To conclude this, women empowerment is quite an important factor for the overall development of a nation and that is why females should be given a fair chance to participate in any subjects including science majors in schools. This trend would bring more positive outcomes than restricting their fields of education and work.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-16 | Prabhp | 73 | view |
2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
2018-09-14 | JOHN JEYARAJ | 84 | view |
2017-07-26 | ekki21 | 84 | view |
- rich countries should help poorer countries when they suffer natural disasters.do you agree? 73
- rich countries should help poorer countries when they suffer natural disasters do you agree 52
- People nowadays are not fit and active than the people from the olden days Discuss the causes for this situation and suggest some possible solutions 82
- Write a letter to complain about a situation in which some adolescents let their dogs run wildly causing a dangerous situation. 89
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single.some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both views and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
...aditional mentality women are generally prefer with literature. For instance, In India...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e. For instance, In India, there are 44% women who preferred literature to look f...
^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...seats in many prestigious universities. Thus the day is not far away when the social...
^^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g science. For instance, great scientist like Kalpana Chawla and Marie Curie both...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, still, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03384615385 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74617065283 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575384615385 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.9606007667 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.846153846 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154233502348 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546553905979 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462713539269 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102585327335 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370918824 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.