Some think that governments should tax unhealthy foods to encourage people to eat healthier. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Can levying tax on junk food would make people start living a healthy life? Dwelling deep into thought, many a man more often than not believe that imposing a tax on the unhealthy food will inspire the citizen to stay fit. I completely disagree with the notion because it is an inefficient way to suppress the desires of the individuals towards their food habits.
Arguably, a myriad of masses in the metropolitan cities do not resort to east fast food for no reason. While in the developed cities owing to the fast pacing lifestyle, people are unable to cook for themselves and have to depend on the outside food due to this. Hence, if the government imposes a tax on junk food it would not only make the food unaffordable to the individuals but also, create hindrance in their professional growth as they have to cut back on their working hours. A painstaking research has had been undertaken by the food delivery application Zomato, which revealed that 58% of the population in the city of Delhi rely on food delivery as they do not have time to cook food for themselves.
That being said, since the increase in tax the fast-food will become unaffordable for the poor people, which in turn will promote starvation in the country. So, if the government rather than increasing taxes, must layout policies for promoting a healthier lifestyle in the country. For instance, no sooner did a survey conducted by the Harvard University on the health guidelines of providing rebates for opening a gym in the country on Australia, than it was revealed that 34% of the population lost fat and became fit.
To conclude, it can be asserted that junk food has become a part of the daily routine for the individual and for the economy. Therefore, as long as the government introduces alternative ways to promote a healthy lifestyle in the country, there will be no need for an increase in taxes on fast food which would lead to a socially stable and healthy society; lest goof outcomes should be far out of reach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-31 | HARANMOL SINGH | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-25 | kjot_59 | 61 | view |
- In some countries most people prefer to rent a house rather than buying one Describe the advantages and disadvantages of renting 78
- Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities What are the reasons Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages 73
- Many students take part time jobs while studying in the universities Is this a bad or a good idea 78
- Write a letter to your friend inviting him her to a music concert Please say Where and when does the concert start What type of music will be played there Why do you think your friend will enjoy it 73
- There are severe social consequences to housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'painstaking research'.
Suggestion: Painstaking research
...ave to cut back on their working hours. A painstaking research has had been undertaken by the food del...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73504273504 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66793867439 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535612535613 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5099113161 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176849963343 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709773352385 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306501117312 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109972651805 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404617560157 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.