In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem?

Famine has been a serious issue over the world for a long time even though agriculture has undergone tremendous improvements. It is obvious that we need to solve the problem of hungry people who could not get the benefit of increased amount of agricultural produce. To devise possible solutions, we need to deal with reasons of the situation. Thus, reasons and solutions of the problem will be treated in the following paragraphs.

The main reason of starvation is the inequality of distribution of wealth which has been being happened internationally. Although we have more affluent food resources than ever, they are not equally distributed to every person in the world. Since most of them are consumed by rich people or countries, the share for poor people is not sufficient, which makes them suffer from hunger. The rich countries with high GDP such as USA or Japan are enjoying various kinds of food ingredients imported from other countries including the countries where the starvation rate is high. However, at the same time, people in some countries are going through harsh lack of food, even though they cultivate significant amount of produce most of which are exported to other developed countries.

To solve those matters, we have to secure the ways to ensure enough income and food resources for needy people. One of the ways is to enlarge fair trade all over the world. Fair trade is the concept of ensuring fair compensation for labour of farmers in poor countries. Because most of farmers in developing countries have been given too low income considering the amount of their labour, fair compensation would help them purchase and consume enough food. Also, national actions should be taken to prevent famine; banning excessive food resources export and protection of domestic farmers. In these ways, people might improve their life without worries about hunger.

To sum up, the inequality of wealth has caused that people experience starvation even though we have the enough amount of produce. As the solution of this problem, fair trade and national actions should be spread all over the world.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the farmers') or simply say ''most farmers''.
Suggestion: most of the farmers; most farmers
...r of farmers in poor countries. Because most of farmers in developing countries have been given...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09770114943 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64064668771 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543103448276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5264354622 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.352941176 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05882352941 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107694970733 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381930659534 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410370073724 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771900057085 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371084371602 0.056905535591 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.