There are more cars on the roads these days and more accidents are happening. As a result, some politicians have suggested that people should take regular driving tests throughout their lives, rather than one single test. What do you think are the advantages of repeat driving tests? Do these outweigh the disadvantages?
In most of the countries, people take a driving test before they are awarded the driving licence and renewal of driving licence does not require the person to retake the test. Some politicians, however, suggest that repetitive test should replace the 'test once in a lifetime' policy. Undeniably, the proposed policy has some advantages but the drawbacks are far greater.
To begin with, the recursive driving test seems like a solution to the increasing driving offence but in reality, people's carelessness, violation of traffic rules and driving under the influence are the main causes for most of the accidents. Therefore the authorities should spend more money and manpower for ensuring road safety than retesting driver's ability. It is a scientific fact that adept drivers are less likely to forget their driving skill unless they get physically unfit. Considering this, the authority should update the drivers about the changes of traffic rules, not test their ability to drive a vehicle. Moreover, strict punishment and penalty should be imposed for the traffic rule violation.
Furthermore, a periodic driving test would kill people's money, time and energy on the one hand and drain the government's budget on the other hand. According to a recent report, new applicants have to wait for several weeks to get a driving licence due to the insufficient facility and manpower. Having the repetitive driving skill test would thus make this far worse.
To conclude, rather than questing people's ability to remember how to drive, strict policies and road safety should get priority. Driver's should be educated not tested on their ability to drive a car as this proposed policy would add burden both to the ordinary people and the authority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 61 | view |
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television. However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well-educated today. 73
- Nowadays in many countries, people are following the latest fashion, hairstyles and so on. Why are they so influenced by fashion? Is it a positive or a negative development? 84
- You would like to participate in a work-related seminar in another country. Write a letter to the person in charge of the seminar and ask for detailed information regarding the dates, program, accommodation and cost. 89
- Education is very important. How can children who are disinterested in the study to be motivated to learn? 73
- Some people think that students who do not take a break in studies between the high school and the university are at disadvantage compared to students that travel and work after high school before furthering their education. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... main causes for most of the accidents. Therefore the authorities should spend more money...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imposed for the traffic rule violation. Furthermore, a periodic driving test wou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20921985816 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57636498899 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3475336881 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293757355395 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106528766109 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527443580444 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184647205281 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341412708542 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.