There are severe social consequences to housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Can infrastructural planning of a city, to develop a more sustainable environment can solve the problem of scarcity of land for the construction of new houses in cities? As a matter of fact, more often than not it is believed by many a man that inhabitability in big cities due to the shortage of housing space can only be resolved by the government. I completely support the idea because the land in the world is limited and if deforestation is not controlled, the world would become inhabitable for future generations due to lack of oxygen.
Arguably, migration of people to metropolitan cities have not increased in the recent times for no reason. In the modern era, the individuals have entered into big cities for a better lifestyle. Since the planning of the cities is held in the hands of the government, it becomes their duty to promote alternative ways such as building low priced skyscraper apartments to save the sanctity of the environment and provide shelter for the people. A painstaking research by the Harvard University has had been undertaken on the laws enacted by the government of England to save them from the scarcity of land, which revealed as soon as the migrant workers were provided with houses on multi-level buildings at basic prices than the scarcity of the land in the country could be controlled by 51%.
Notwithstanding the brighter side, the trend certainly has its limitations. Given the current state of the legislation in the countries around the world, the government is only equipped to formulate laws and are unable to execute their plans at the grass-root level. Many private companies have come forward to invest in remote areas for setting up factories, which will not only generate work for the individuals but also, it will lower the migration of the people to a more developed city for a better life. For instance, no sooner did a survey conducted by Tesla a leading electric car manufacture, than it was unfolded that building a plant for the production of cars in a remote area will generate 10% employment in the villages. Although, this is not entirely untrue, but the impact is not that severe than assumed.
To conclude, but for any doubt, for proper infrastructure in a city, the government should be held accountable. Therefore, if a balance between developed and developing areas are made by the government, it would lead to a socially stable and professionally enriching lives; lest good outcomes should be far out of reach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-07 | HARANMOL SINGH | 73 | view |
- Many people believe that big businesses in addition to generating profits should be involved in and responsible for the social life of the community To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your opinion 67
- Write a letter to your friend inviting him her to a music concert Please say Where and when does the concert start What type of music will be played there Why do you think your friend will enjoy it 73
- Many students take part time jobs while studying in the universities Is this a bad or a good idea 78
- Due to television and the internet it is easier today for a large number of people to become famous Is it a positive or a negative development 56
- While recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and include relevant examples 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'painstaking research'.
Suggestion: Painstaking research
...nt and provide shelter for the people. A painstaking research by the Harvard University has had been ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, as for, for instance, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97441470833 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538095238095 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6142460545 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13320016085 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483984182786 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539565022723 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824315437115 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548390668481 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.