Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Today most of the purchases are based on the adverts we see. Therefore, most of the purchases have become impulsive rather than a need. I completely agree that 75% of purchases that are made today is because of the advertisements.
Firstly, most of the consumer products that are advertised today are linked with technology. In the mobile phone segment, most of the competitors have similar features, but still they advertise and display that as a unique feature and trap individuals. For example, I owned a Google Pixel mobile with Facial recognition technology, and Apple recently launched a mobile with similar feature and named as 3D facial recognition plus, stating this is only mobile to use this technology. In fact, after a few researches I found that both the technology is same and developed by same company for both Google and Apple. This is the power of advertisement they pull customers by using such marketing tricks and sell products.
Secondly, there are very few adverts that display genuine quality of their products. Most of them don’t provide full details of their goods and may mislead also. Only after using the product we get to know the defects of the product and it's too late by then as we already purchased them. For example, a latest smartphone that advertised that this is the best mobile in the market today started exploding in people’s hand. Believing the advert many of them bought the products and eventually it turned out to be a life threatening device.
To conclude, advertisements show only the good side of the products. Purchasing products by just seeing them will sometime lead to wrong decision. It always better to hear the reviews about a product as word of mouth is the best advertisement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-23 | soofya_k | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | singhpreeti | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-19 | sharath957 | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | khan0229 | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | dinabdo | 78 | view |
- In cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem. What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem? 56
- In companies promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company and not to somebody outside the company or new hiring Do you agree or disagree with this view 71
- Nowadays parents are sending their children to trips abroad for educational purpose. What are the advantages and disadvantages of it? 78
- Some people think that men are naturally more competitive than women. To what extent doyou agree or disagree? 73
- Some people argue that a growing number of young people spend too much time in watching TV Why does this phenomenon happen And what kinds of activities should be encouraged to them 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... details of their goods and may mislead also. Only after using the product we get to...
^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...we already purchased them. For example, a latest smartphone that advertised that ...
^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...etime lead to wrong decision. It always better to hear the reviews about a product as ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98976109215 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79322293686 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549488054608 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9713600427 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0916522616986 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344223561925 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319893671573 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531833758363 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185502971898 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.