These days, mobile phones and the internet are very important to the ways in which
people relate to one another socially. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the
disadvantages?
Communication today have become easier than what it used to be.Today myriad of people use their mobile to communicate with their loved ones, whereas earlier people had more face to face discussions. This new trend of communication has more advantage than the disadvantage and this essay with discuss both the sides.
On one hand, earlier people made friends by seeing them face to face in parties, social events and so on. This helped them in assessing a person’s character since they meet regularly and that was only the source for communicating. However, today majority of people make friends and life partners online through Facebook and other social sites. It is difficult to know if the person is genuine since lots of fake profiles are created and are not verified. For example, one of my friend found a partner through a dating site and planned to marry him until it was found that he was already a married person and a fraudster.
On the contrary,With the help of mobile and internet communication have become easier and cheaper. Moreover, today that same communication are being done with minutes and with lesser charges of free most of the time. With apps like whats app, Facebook chat and so on messaging someone sitting miles away from us have become much easier. In fact, we can communicate by seeing them virtually face to face through video calling apps. For example, my brother is settled in the US and with the video calling app we communicate regularly and i never felt that he is miles away from us since we communicate regularly.
To conclude, with the help of mobile and internet relationships are still being maintained.. Clearly, the advantages outweigh the disadvantage with regards to how mobile and internet have helped people to talk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-24 | sharath957 | 87 | view |
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 61
- Some people think that money is one of the most essential factors in promoting happiness.Do you think people can be happy without much money? what other factors contribute towards happiness? 61
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problems as a result.Why do so many working people not get enough exercise? What can be done about this problem? 73
- For centuries, important parts of education have remained such as reading, writing and maths. With the advent of computers, some people think that computer skill should be made a fourth skill to be added to the list. To what extent do you agree? 73
- In companies promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company and not to somebody outside the company or new hiring Do you agree or disagree with this view 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Today
...e become easier than what it used to be.Today myriad of people use their mobile to co...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , With
...n and a fraudster. On the contrary,With the help of mobile and internet communi...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...f free most of the time. With apps like whats app, Facebook chat and so on messaging ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 91, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...relationships are still being maintained.. Clearly, the advantages outweigh the di...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, still, whereas, for example, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97986577181 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70598833443 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530201342282 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3300403538 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0797193775782 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363457446341 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453709656967 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651451968212 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496123850549 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.