Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourist who visit such places?
Nowadays, tourism in uninhabited areas is grown by leaps and bound. In addition, young generation prefers holidays in destinations like Antarctica or deserts over cliché destinations of Europe. This essay will give a detailed explanation in the following paragraphs on merits and demerits of visiting these secluded areas.
When masses explore these unpopular destinations, they get enlightened with the beauty of nature around them. Moreover, when people visit these locations, they are also acquainted with adverse effects climate changes can cause to their surroundings. For instance, people have started cleaning water bodies like lakes in their neighbourhood. A Japanese scientist has found a chemical solution to clean polluted lakes and has cleaned a whole lake in his regional area as a proof. As a result, tourism in these abandoned areas have made people realised the value of edible water.
There are a couple of demerits in exploring locations with no human population. Firstly, temperature in those areas is rising by the heat generated by humans through fire pollution or through transport. Secondly, the food of wildlife in those surroundings are getting affected as human have to hunt for feeding themselves when visiting these habitats. To illustrate, human fishing is reducing the count of fishes for penguins and seals as well as it is also observed humans are hunting them for their survival. Therefore, expansion of tourism would lead to extinction of wildlife in these areas and disturb the overall food chain.
To conclude, biodiversity can only be preserved when people are familiarised with the difficulties they will face when vegetation goes extinct. Thus, the United Nations should have strict regulations for tourists exploring no human zone places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | vivekrana | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | ChitraSenthil | 89 | view |
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourist who visit such places? 11
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourist who visit such places? 11
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.What is your opinion on this? 11
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourist who visit such places? 11
- In many places new homes are needed but the only space available for building them is in countryside Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there What is your opinion on this 26
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourists exploring no human zone places.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45848375451 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86221261871 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620938628159 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5313315142 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.8 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0661464297193 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0220307242455 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268614318929 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0419977365821 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00880590120985 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.