Today, prison is the most common solution for crime. However, the more effective solution is to provide people with better education so that they do not become criminals.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, prison is one of the most controversial issues that people like debating about. Many people believe that the wide use of prison will promote socializing criminals in a positive way, on the contrary, others think that the more effective resolution is to reform people with proper education according to their level of education. In this essay, I will address my opinion of the topic and give supportive examples.
Obviously, in my opinion, we should have to encourage inmates to study themselves so that they can remain their interests of education. Many news presenters say, most of the criminals are not serial killers or crucial crimes unless light penalty of the crime. And their intellectual capacities are lower than other ordinary human that is caused from their family background. More than 60 percentage of criminals have lack of education, love, interest and enough support from their guidance. For example, by training selected prisoners such as frauds, scammers, thieve, and having less than 6 years penalty in Korea (especially, women prison), there seems appear not to return to prison for good.
Therefore, I totally agree that criminals need diverse education for making their own living. The government should support them not to come back. If they get a job, they will independent on themselves, not relying on their fraud skills. Even though it takes a lot of work and efforts, it will be worthwhile for their future. The human's basic needs are contained not only food, water, clothing and shelter but also education.
In conclusion, managing and controlling dwellers safely is essential condition of human right. The contribution of time expense of educating to people who have inappropriate direction from their households is to provide by governmental social security.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-05-21 | Kuldeep Kumar | 78 | view |
2019-05-08 | MJ Yand | 89 | view |
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by peopleand that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue thathumans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses forfood and research. Discu 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 84
- More and more people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering,computing and medicine.Some people belive that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor countries.Ot 56
- You recently encountered some problems with public transportation service in your area. Write a letter to the manager of the public transport company and sayWhat were the problemsExplain how these problems affect the publicSuggest what changes could be ma 84
- A friend has agreed to look after your house and pet while you are on holiday. Write a letter to your friend.In your letter:-give contact details for when you are away-give instructions about how to care for your pet-describe other household duties 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ison will promote socializing criminals in a positive way, on the contrary, others think that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27430555556 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76097129299 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645833333333 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4969643953 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.266666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158125638835 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482587896412 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399263848703 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921141054354 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298778424421 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.