Today tourism is one of the world's biggest industries and many poorer counties add depending more and more on tourism for their economy.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage?
It is believed that, to a greater extent, economy of impoverished countries depends on tourism industry which is gaining ground as one of the largest industries of world. Although, there are some disadvantages in form of fear of disapeerance of local culture and deficiency of natural resources, I believe that, development of local community and countries are prime advantagees that outweigh disadvantages.
The pivotal demerit is the chance of loosing native culture. That is to say that, if the number of tourists incessantly augment then, they would make a huge impact of their culture on indigenous people and eventually the host culture would be disappeared. For example, western culture has made a great impact in Indian people that Indians are forgetting their vernacular culture and accepting foreign culture. In addition to that, tourist, sometimes damage the historical monuments which would be expensive for local people to refurbish them. Moreover, tourists will use the natural resources that are already deficient to local community. However, I believe that, there are more benefits of tourism.
On the contrary, local people would get benefited in several ways. Firstly, when tourist purchase the local products, it will utterly help local people financially. Secondly, government of poor countries would charge more to tourist to visit local places which is again beneficial for host government. To illustrate, some of African countries charge more fees to tourists than local people. Thirdly, people will spread the culture of history country in their own countries which would give international reputation to a particular country. Hence it can be said that, benefits have an upperhand over its drawbacks.
In conclusion, though, native culture would be damaged and well as lost, I believe that, tourism will be proven beneficial to local communities as it will increase the economy of not only people but also for government and it is recommended that, every nation should patronize tourism.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-02-07 | VishvAdthakkar | 67 | view |
- Many people believe that having a fixes punishment for all crimes is more efficient.Give advantages and disadvantages of this statement and give your opinion. 56
- Some people think that watching sport is wastage of time during leisure time. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Nowadays children mostly spend time playing computer games rather than sports What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 66
- Globalization has many post effects on world's economy but the negative effects of it cannot be forgottenDiscuss both the views and give your own opinion. 73
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicines. Government funding should reflect this.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nal reputation to a particular country. Hence it can be said that, benefits have an u...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43630573248 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85043233591 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53821656051 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7430476748 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9333333333 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12873074915 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507287481198 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596775045339 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931989263418 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418947240965 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.