Tourism today creates a variety of problems, such as pollution due to flights, transport and dirty water.
Do you think that governments should impose extra taxes on flights or accommodation to restrict today’s tourism industry?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
In these contemporary days, an ever-increasing tourism has made whole world a global village; however, it has brought numerous dire consequences including burgeoning of pollution owing to air and road transport and polluted water. In order to control it, It is believed by a vast section of the society that the tariffs should be introduced by authority on flights or accommodation. I strongly agree with this view and in my discourse ahead, the ideas in favor of my belief are discussed.
To begin with, it seems obvious to see that extra tax on air tickets would restrict air travelling. This is because the final cost to passengers for air journey
will be higher if government impose more taxes. Resultantly, people's preference to go overseas during holidays would be changed and they prefer to visit local tourist attractions which ultimately would reduce serious effects of it on environment. For example, as per report published in the Toronto Times in 2019 Singapore airlines imposed 15% tax on domestic airlines which had reduced air travelling by 30% compared to previous year. Thus, government's initiative by enforcing taxes would restrict tourism.
Additionally, another prominent measure to control tourists' movement at tourist places is additional charges by local bodies on accommodation. In other words, due to extra charge, visitors will have to pay more to enjoy at tourist places. This would certainly restrict movement of international and local guests' preference to various places which ultimately reduced unwanted outcomes. A best illustration is the Canada government started to charge additional 20% tax on all luxurious hotels at tourist places which has restricted tourism by 15% which has curtail water pollution. Thus, the stringent measure by government can minimize adverse effects of tourism.
In conclusion, while the growth in tourism industry has numerous unequivocal positives, according to me, I think to curb its inevitable impacts to environment, the government should start to charge more to air tickets and bookings at tourist attractions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-16 | farshid.manami@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
- It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 65
- In many parts of the world today there is a profitable market for products which lighten or whiten people s skin Outline the reasons for using such products and discuss what effects they have in terms of health and society Give reasons for your answer and 84
- Write a letter to your friend who is residing in other country Invite your friend to public event Invite him Describe the event Share other plans too 84
- A large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money, either to sponsor a local children's sports team for two years, or to pay for two open-air concerts. It has asked for feedback from the general public.Write a letter to the 84
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job. On the other hand, other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...final cost to passengers for air journey will be higher if government impose more...
^^^
Line 6, column 386, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: The
...h ultimately reduced unwanted outcomes. A best illustration is the Canada governm...
^
Line 6, column 555, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... has restricted tourism by 15% which has curtail water pollution. Thus, the strin...
^^
Line 6, column 557, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'curtailed'.
Suggestion: curtailed
...as restricted tourism by 15% which has curtail water pollution. Thus, the stringent me...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e impacts to environment, the government should start to charge more to air ticke...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43692307692 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00315258417 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603076923077 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6272213498 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.214285714 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190989772891 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663771515125 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500630245726 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991444724426 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184506499077 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.