It is believed that the relocation of large corporations and their employees to rural areas or suburbs can be an effective measure to mitigate traffic congestion and housing crisis in urban areas. Although I agree with this idea, I suggest that this should be carried out in combination with the urbanization of regional areas.
Admittedly, traffic problems and housing crisis can be alleviated by moving large companies and their workforce to the countryside. Regarding traffic concerns, if a large number of skilled workers relocate to outside the city center, there will be fewer traffic jams on major roads during rush hours. Accordingly, remaining citizens in metropolitan regions can save time when travelling. Also, this trend could lead to a reduction in housing and renting prices as more unoccupied accommodations are available in these areas. Thus, more people can afford to purchase their own house or apartment.
However, the aforementioned measure can work well only when policies on the modernization of infrastructure and necessary facilities in rural areas are implemented. Commonly, people are hesitant to reside in regions deficient in decent transportation systems, health care services or educational institutes. This is understandable because humans have a tendency to search for better things to secure themselves and their beloved ones better standards of living Therefore, if regional areas are equipped with numerous modern amenities, they can attract a large number of migrants to settle, thus making city problems concerning traffic and housing less serious.
In conclusion, I believe that the relocation of manufacturers and their workforce to the outskirts of cities can be an efficient measure to diminish housing and transportation issues, if governments integrate some policies on improving facilities and essentials in these areas.
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life. Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future. 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 96
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 67
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and report the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tryside. Regarding traffic concerns, if a large number of skilled workers relocate to outside the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
... outside the city center, there will be fewer traffic jams on major roads during rush hours. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...purchase their own house or apartment. However, the aforementioned measure can ...
^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rous modern amenities, they can attract a large number of migrants to settle, thus making city pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62544169611 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11997926659 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590106007067 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.2632768025 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.727272727 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352040476522 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129654364906 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104613325305 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205465948444 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084215699644 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.