Universities should develop methods to support students who come from rural and disadvantageous backgrounds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The college attainment gap between rural and urban students is widening as disadvantaged students are unable to bear the expense of university education. Hence, universities ought to follow certain methodologies that enable these students to acquire university education.
Education plays a paramount role to achieve success in life and therefore, should be accessible to everyone. Unfortunately, students from economically backward areas are unable to pursue university education due to lack of financial resources. Therefore, universities could provide need-based scholarships to these students. Furthermore, they can make a provision to allocate certain percentage of seats for these less privileged students which would motivate and aid them to pursue university education.
In addition to this, universities can provide free of cost distance learning classes as well as laptops and other study materials to these students when there is no seat available for on-campus admission. This will allow larger number of students to get university degree without worrying about the finances. As a result, more educated and skillful people are produced in the socio-economically backward areas. This would help overall development of that area which consequently will help in nation’s prosperity.
Some may argue that it is unfair for the urban students, if universities prioritize students from rural backgrounds as they feel such initiatives could limit the funds and scholarships available to them. However, I think universities can tackle this concern by balancing the funds and seats on basis of need and merits. This will not hinder the education of talented regular students as well as it will avail in poorer students to access university education.
In conclusion, I believe that universities should initiate various admission methodologies such as funds, seat allocation and distance learning to assist underprivileged students to get higher education.
- Universities should develop methods to support students who come from rural and disadvantageous backgrounds To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter – explain why you changed jobs – describe your new job – tell him/her your other news 56
- Universities should develop methods to support students who come from rural and disadvantageous backgrounds. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child's development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.Which viewpoint do you agree with? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 86, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
... free of cost distance learning classes as well as laptops and other study materia...
^^
Line 13, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ation's prosperity. Some may argue that it is unfair for the urban student...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83793103448 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22255908235 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565517241379 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.030414304 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.928571429 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186428196528 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708756079083 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042839057086 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116310825064 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375552546063 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.