The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Mobile Phone has transfigured our life in many ways. These phones allow us to communicate anytime anywhere. With the increasing demand and excessive use of mobile at all places forced people to ponder about its prohibition at some locations. I believe that given statement has strong reasons to restrain the phone at some public spots.
The principal argument against the ban of mobile phone is security concern. Nowadays most of the mobile phones are adorned with effective camera and with zooming facility. Thus, it provides a tool to click the snaps of secured places and analyze later. Further, owing to small size camera, people able to take pictures or shoot videos of other person without his/her consent and breach the privacy law. For instance, my classmate who was drunk at her birthday party in city center was photographed clandestinely by mobile and later posted those pictures on social medial to tarnish her image.
Another reason is creating the disturbance and distorts the environment of some areas. In cities, there are some places where people like to spend time peacefully. It is noted that mobile phones has disrupted the tranquility of such places and also becoming a major source of sound pollution because of varieties of ringtones played by people.
Finally, the mobile phone commonly known as disruptors in social and public life emerged as cause for people not interacting in real. In these days even at social gathering such as marriage or procession, people avoid to have discussion with friends or family members and get indulged in browsing internet or playing games. A case in a point is my nephews birthday where everyone was checking mobile without any actual requirement.
To sum-up, though mobile phone has various advantages, its use still can be restricted for classified places which will benefits both individual and society by protecting people form unwanted click.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | b.yousefi | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
- People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your opinion. 61
- The tendency of human being to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree? 78
- The use of cctv cameras in street, station, shops and other public places has increased rapidly in recent years. Although we are told that these cameras help in the fight against crime, some people are opposed to their use. They believe that everyone has 84
- Many people think that international travel will decrease in future. Do you think it is a positive development? Give examples from your experience. 78
- Prevention is better than cure." Out of a country's health budget, large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?You should use your 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid having'.
Suggestion: avoid having
... such as marriage or procession, people avoid to have discussion with friends or family membe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, still, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18064516129 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60133640512 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632258064516 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3619168355 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.375 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230296141487 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798775271085 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629408516278 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127982452249 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293144008346 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.