The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Mobile phones are considered antisocial and similar to smoking, therefore a significant number of individuals believe that mobile phones must be forbidden as smoking is in some locations. In my opinion, I completely disagree because mobile phones are essential and make people social virtually with the help of internet.
Firstly, banning mobile phones will disconnect people from the rest of the world, as mobile connectivity helps people to remain in touch with others at any hour of the day and irrespective of location. For instance, in today’s world, people can contact with each other with the help of telephones mainly, especially to overseas family members and friends. Therefore, without phones, it may be difficult for them to know about each other during any time.
Secondly, mobile phones also act as a career for social connectivity with the help of internet. While people are not physically connected, they can share their emotions and feelings about any concern they have on social platforms like Facebook applications. For instance, recently a cricket world cup match held in London between India and New Zealand was criticized by fans and critics on different platforms with the help of mobile phones because of low quality umpiring. Hence banning these items can create more problems in the society.
However, the excess use or misuse of these gadgets can make people isolated from society and the addiction of such items can also show adverse impacts on individuals, some precautionary measures like discipline in usage can eliminate such problems.
In conclusion, prohibiting mobile phone usage is no way an effective way to control the antisocial behaviour of individuals, however, this step will increase the difficulty in connecting with other individuals. Hence, banning of mobile phones is no way similar to smoking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | b.yousefi | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
- Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them while others believe that this won't work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 71
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- When families have a meal together it is considered social activity. Do you think eating together is important to people in your country? 56
- Today many doctors say that people are not getting enough time for physical exercise.What are the causes? What can be done? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...phones because of low quality umpiring. Hence banning these items can create more pro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36643835616 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80815861946 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6090853441 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266705330835 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115910343329 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108937051189 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158402046829 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101478892533 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.