In recent years, there have been some controversies about the safety of vaccines. These arguments have led to the suggestion that we should not take children to receive vaccines that can be used to prevent diseases. Some people think it unnecessary to do it because the safety of vaccines cannot be ensured. However, I disagree with their opinions to a large extent for two reasons.
To begin with, parents have responsibility to have their children inoculated for the sake of all people’s health. If our children who do not receive vaccines are infected with any deadly disease, they are very likely to spread the virus to someone else, such as their classmates, friends and even their parents. Worse still, the whole city might be devastated by the epidemic; however, if all of us can realize the importance of vaccination, we can prevent it easily. Therefore, it is necessary to take our children to receive vaccines.
In addition, the safety of vaccines is always guaranteed so that the public can eliminate their unnecessary fear and worry. For example, many medical studies have revealed that vaccines are under a series of clinical trials and strict examinations. Only the vaccines which pass the examination can be used for our children, so the quality of vaccines is completely reliable. More important, we usually get immunized at licensed hospitals, so we have no reason to worry about the menace of fake vaccines.
In conclusion, it is preposterous to deny the practice of immunization on the ground that the majority of vaccines which must undergo long-term experiments can effectively safeguard people from contracting any life-threatening diseases. Hence, parents should embrace this medical treatment rather than disapprove of its effectiveness.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: kusumverma
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24381625442 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97633496788 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579505300353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9669379678 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162779259751 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576235052862 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482685680061 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981762729165 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393548966749 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.