Violence in the media promotes violence in society.
To what extent do you agree?
There is a belief that media encourages members of society to act abnormally by reporting acts of atrocity. In this essay, I disagrees with their point of view.
Let us start with the reasons why some social workers claim that the act of cruelty on TV trigger atrocity in reality. The first argument is that it encourages some people commit the same crime to gain popularity. Criminals often receive publicity upon apprehension, so some of the news followers want to gain fame by perpetrating a similar crime. Another reason that violence in mass media may mislead immature minds about the world. Young people may express themselves violently, once this kind of publication encourages them by immoral pictures. Furthermore, it frequently motives more people carry protection means. People, for example, in Kazakhstan tend to use guns as self-defence, which also increase crime rate.
However, some media presenters believe that reported act of cruelty has positive effects on society for the following reasons. First of all, it makes people aware of criminals. For example, newspapers often show pictures of former sex-offenders with description to notify people of their atrocious behavior. Secondly, media warns people of the consequences of breaking law. People are often unaware of possible implications if they decide to assault others, but with TV programs can deter them from their illegal intention. Finally, broadcasting both violence and subsequent apprehension usually persuades citizens that police officers work. People often blame the police force for their inaction; however, documentaries about various crimes with arrest may change their opinion about policemen.
In conclusion, even though sociologists argue that cruelty highlighted on mass media exacerbates brutal conduct in public, I am opposeto their opinion and think that such highlights discourages anti-social actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | avneet28 | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | lokeshpareek87 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | being | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
- A friend you met last year has invited you to visit him/her in his/her country. You have never been there before and need some information before you leave.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:request advise about a gift for his/her familyask abo 78
- Some people think that intelligence is innate while others think that we can improve our intelligence through learning Discuss both sides and give your opinion 90
- Violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree? 11
- Most artists earn low salaries and therefore should receive findings from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree? 78
- As a result of tourism and the increasing number of people traveling there is an growing demand for more flights What problems does this have on the environment What measures could be taken to solve the problems 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'disagree'
Suggestion: disagree
...ting acts of atrocity. In this essay, I disagrees with their point of view. Let us st...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...receive publicity upon apprehension, so some of the news followers want to gain fame by per...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62152777778 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86651450056 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652777777778 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9572435846 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2352941176 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0687587453216 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0248473569992 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423172562229 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0408440227934 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00932558451863 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.