While recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to personal qualities rather than qualification and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is argued that companies should prioritize personal qualities over the prove of professions’ training and experience when hiring employees. This essay strongly disagrees with this statement because qualities such as assertiveness will reduce the effectiveness of workers’ cooperation while qualification and experience ensure that employers always have their outsourced jobs done.
Teamwork in a workplace will likely be compromised when every worker asserts their own opinions. This is because each individual with such assertiveness will try to stick with their ideas even when these ideas are bad. Moreover, people will bash others who oppose. This type of disagreement between colleagues will then badly affect their cooperation at work. For example, my old team in the national technology company often could not collaborate very well because everyone tried to protect their ideas against the analyzing and suggestions from others.
In contrast, companies can reassure that their jobs will be taken care of professionally when they focus on people’s qualification and experience. This is to say that workers who are well-trained and have worked in their fields for a long time usually can handle tasks faster and more effective. For instance, surveys show that banks which have more senior bankers usually finish transactions between customers quicker and more secure. Likewise, contractors in Vietnam say that their supervisor is less needed when they entrust jobs in engineers graduated from Bach Khoa University of technology.
In conclusion, the importance of qualification and experience still cannot be put behind personal qualities as professional and experienced workers are more highly competent to handle their work tasks and quality such as assertiveness will only obstruct people’s teamwork.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | Hai Bung Bia | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | drtruong92 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that an advertisement on TV is useless and others disagree Discuss both sides and give your opinion 59
- write a letter yo your manager about a new colleaguewho makes things difficult at work for all of your team.Describe why he makes it difficult.Describe your feeling regarding the situation.What do you want your manager to do about it? 84
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 73
- Some people think that the governments should invest in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ould prioritize personal qualities over the prove of professions' training and exper...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'company'.
Suggestion: often company
... my old team in the national technology company often could not collaborate very well because...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, so, still, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79335793358 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10631856321 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619926199262 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3860167754 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0909803975966 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352217352865 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405881869135 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722277022071 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480874337332 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.