Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weekness. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender?
there have always differences in the type of work women and men have done. many people claim that it is all in all correct to eliminate males and females from positive occupation, i am in favour of the view that people to have greater freedom of choice in terms of employment, gender quality should be encouraged.
there may indeed be good arguments for allowing certain posts to remain predominantly male or female. most men do not have the skills to work in certain career such as a nanny and some women do not have the physical attributes to work in certain job such as soldier.For example in the nursery school the babysitter are all women because female have better male about childcare like feeding, changing diapers, sooth a baby cry. As well as many job need strengths such as construction worker, fireman and it is suitable for men.
however in the vast majority of situations making occupations more open to both genders has distinct of advantage. men and women can bring slightly different perspectives and approaches to a job. For instance, female police officers may have a greater understanding of domestic violence and a better range of strategies for dealing with a problem. In addition, business feel that it is fine to not hire men beautician for these posts because most of their customers would not be willing to have a man perform that service.
To summarise, the changes that result from allowing men into female - dominated occupations and vice versa may be subtle but they are far - reaching. However, to benefit the most from this development, it is important not to expect males and females to approach work in identical ways.
- Women and meh are commonly seen as having different strengths and weekness Is it right to excludemales or females from certain profession because of their gender 73
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weekness Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there have always differences in the type of ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...e type of work women and men have done. many people claim that it is all in all corr...
^^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s and females from positive occupation, i am in favour of the view that people to...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... gender quality should be encouraged. there may indeed be good arguments for allowi...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...to remain predominantly male or female. most men do not have the skills to work in c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... to work in certain job such as soldier.For example in the nursery school the babys...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
..., fireman and it is suitable for men. however in the vast majority of situations maki...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
..., fireman and it is suitable for men. however in the vast majority of situations maki...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Men
...both genders has distinct of advantage. men and women can bring slightly different ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87234042553 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70610446742 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570921985816 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.2141456837 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.909090909 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317611437119 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113509578751 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580384301552 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185638603116 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346863276899 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.