Women and men are commonly seen as having different strength and weakness.
Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender?
Gone are the days when women were confined to hearth whereas this phenomenon has undergone a sea change ever since the westernization took place. Females are also stepping into every job vistas. A section of society adheres that due to different strength and weakness certain job types are not meant for males and some for females. However, I completely demur the statement as everyone can do their best in any field regardless of gender.
First and foremost reason that why women can perform equal to men in same area of job is that they are mentally strong and have immense patience. To be more precise, these days, females are intelligent enough to take spontaneous decisions due to higher education done by them; which was not the part of their life in previous few decades. Consequently, they are even doing better than males and enjoy a very excel life. Kiran bedi, for example, an Indian lady police, did not feel hesitation to cut the challan of Indira Gandhi, prime Minister of India, without thinking that she was the women of integrity. Therefore, women handle the situations with immense patience and subtle manners. Likewise, females are indulging in Navy, border security Force and so on due to their self defence skills. By this I mean, they are able to cope up in henious situations and performing well in grave conditions. Thus, giving priority to men in such job vistas is never commendable.
However, some people think that some works are not meant for men like involving in cooking, household chores and professions like teaching; which is absurd to believe. Men have good culinary skills and are becoming chef in renowned hotels. Gordon Ramsay, for instance, has been considered the best cook in the world by National Chef Department. Not only this but males are also showing wonders by handling their children and household chores. We, in some cases, do jobs whereas men take care of home which is common sight in many societies. As such, prejudice is reduced.
To recapitulate, I vehemently vouch that assigning the people in jobs regards of their gender is never appreciable since it paves the way to discrimination which can never make a nation progressed. However, unbiased society always promotes the equality and infuses the masses with oodles of confidence and positivity.
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events Do you think this is a positive or negative development 92
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing Do you agree or disagree 95
- Many people live in the outskirts when they go for holiday do you think it is good or bad? 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 56
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What are the reasons for doing this Is it a negative or positive development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Gone are the days when women were confined to he...
^^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for males and some for females. However, I completely demur the statement as ever...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance, i mean, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98701298701 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60702632723 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612987012987 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8541165 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208848448038 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501355915617 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381661544966 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111373955894 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04535852306 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.