Write about the following topic.
In many countries it is now illegal to smoke in public places. It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building.
Do you agree or disagree?
You should write at least 250 words.
Smoking in public is serious issue in many countries. This led governments to put permanent ban on smoking in public as this will not affect the other people who do not smoke directly. I strongly agree as this will adversely affect the non-smokers indirectly.
There is positive advantage of people leaving the building for inhaling cigarettes. In other words, person who smokes leaves the building will not have direct effect on someone who does not smoke. This is because non-smokers who is working with smokers can able continue their current work. At the end, this will have positive effect on individual who does not smoke as certain person can focus on their regular work without having irritation from cigarette's smoke. For example, recent survey shows that passive smoking can also cause severe health problems such as lung cancer and mouth cancer.
Another positive step is that smokers may not able to adversely affect the other people's health. While person smoke publicly have severe health problems, if another individual standing with them without smoking which will also have passive smoke into their lungs. This will also directly affect the non-smokers. Without smoking, they might also receive serious respiratory issues like asthma and lung cancers. Thus, if smokers leave the public place, they can smoke to some other remote location where they can not put indirect effect on non-smokers.
In conclusion, although this will have slight irritation for individual who smokes because they would require the leave the place, this would have actual benefits for people who do not smoke. This way smokers can not indirectly affect other peoples' health prospects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-17 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | Armandeep kaur20 | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-11 | Agni | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | skgurna4567@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-05 | Krutika Barot | 67 | view |
- Some children receive almost no encouragement from their parents regarding their performance at school while other children receive too much pressure from their over enthusiastic parents which can have negative impacts on the child Why do you think some p 73
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 84
- More and more business meeting taking place online What are advantages and disadvantages of this trend 61
- You share a parking area with several neighbours and have recently started having problems Write a letter to be copied to all neighbours that share the parking area In that letter explaining the problems suggesting ways to help the situation proposing a p 78
- Some people think visitors to other countries should imitate local customs and behaviors Other people disagree they think the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss the two views and give your opinion 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt ban on smoking in public as this will not affect the other people who do not s...
^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n person can focus on their regular work without having irritation from cigarette...
^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... not able to adversely affect the other peoples health. While person smoke publicly hav...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26765799257 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35242270148 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498141263941 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.279177959 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212939810699 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879274324926 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703632799231 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159132951344 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221355819746 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt ban on smoking in public as this will not affect the other people who do not s...
^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n person can focus on their regular work without having irritation from cigarette...
^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... not able to adversely affect the other peoples health. While person smoke publicly hav...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26765799257 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35242270148 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498141263941 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.279177959 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212939810699 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879274324926 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703632799231 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159132951344 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221355819746 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.