1
As knowledge and experience serve as towers in problem-solving, one is often
presented with two major paths that pave the way for final fulfillment, either to wrack his brain,
just like what happened to Neuton, siiting for many years under an apple tree and eventually
figuring out and of the greatest universal rules that govern the whole globe, or to seek for others’
widsom through their advice, just as in the case of Benjinin Franklin, gathering great minds under
one roof and then establishing a most world-renown libray. Both ways work. When a practical
goal is involved, however, Benjimin Franklin may best be regareded as a role model in this respect
and asking people for advice often turn out to be the prime alternative.
Experience and knowledge borrowed or learned from others’ advice contribute greatly to
effectiveness and effeciency for a goal-accomplishment. Not all experience and knowledge related
to problem-solving can be obtained by personal effort alone due to limitations of mind and
capabilities of each individual. A single thought in someone’s mind is, more often than not, far less
shining compared with group’s wisdom. That explains the famous old saying that one sees further
when standing upon the shoulders’ of past great giants; that explains why a great leader is always
with greater minds; that also explains why teamwork in corperation is highly emphasized in the
21st century. Brainstorm and exchange of ideas between different thoughts never fail to enhance
capabilities of each individula involved, a team, a company, an institution, a country, or even the
entire global village.
Asking others’ advice instead of getting everything done on one’s own promotes democracy
and communication too. In terms of democracy, it is necessary to give others rights and chances to
speak since the problem may concern them in different ways, and their saying in turn reflects our
respect toward freedom of speech as well as their wisdom. In terms of communication, idea
exchange sometimes focuses more than solutions, and hereby better mutual understanding about
perspectives, principles, praticalities and personalities of each other.
Admittely turning to others for help and suggestion by no means refers to absolute and
irresponsible dependence. Consideration upon different thoughts and ideas broadens our mind,
enlarges our vision, furthers understanding, enhances more effective and efficient brainstorm, and
stresses mutual respect in groups and communities, which undoubtedly gives rise to better, if not
the best solutions. As is paraphrased from John F Kenedy, brainstormed, there is little we cannot
do while divided, there is little we can do.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-04 | cogax13515 | view | |
| 2023-06-24 | Leeinho | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | Leeinho | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | ayaitch1elt | 95 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 80
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 90
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 3
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people bahave. 73
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60476190476 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23468307616 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62380952381 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.018226384 48.9658058833 239% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.142857143 100.406767564 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 30.0 4.53405017921 662% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 11.7677419355 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 58.1214874552 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.