9. For schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. Is it better for other teachers to assess than let students assess teachers?
Recently, many public teachers in the South Korea are criticized for their poor teaching ability, which resulted the high proportion of the private education spending of parents in Korea. Therefore, the proper way to assess teachers in the field of education became one of the significant debates in South Korea. Considering this situation, this essay will argue that students’ assessments about their teachers have to
First of all, students are the only people who get lectures of their teachers. The most important factor in the assessment of teachers is the ability to make good lectures in the class. As students are the only people who get lectures from teachers, it can be concluded that they are the most important groups when teachers’ teaching abilities are measured. Also, students are the group that mostly influence by the teacher’s assessments, as it decides which teacher make lectures in their class. Even though it cannot be concluded that students’ assessments are highly objective, it will provide reasonable basis of teachers in our nation’s schools.
Moreover, if we let teachers assess their colleagues, the result of the assessment can be distorted for their own interests, especially in South Korea. In the Republic of Korea, many people consider their colleagues in their workplace as their family member; it comes from the East-Asian culture, which let great importance to unity in the communities. Therefore, many people do not want to assess their colleagues poorly and tend to make decisions that protect them; there are no exceptions in the educational field. If teachers are allowed to assess their colleagues, it will bring negative impacts on our nation’s education.
In a nutshell, assessments of students should be considered more important factor than those of teachers for two bases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-29 | dutjwns123 | 60 | view |
- 10 University freshmen do not know much about university life and learning There are two ways to help freshmen quickly enter university life choose a method that you feel is better and explain why 1 attending a one week orientation or introduction program 70
- 9 For schools assessing teachers teaching efficiency is a very important issue Is it better for other teachers to assess than let students assess teachers 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...assessments about their teachers have to First of all students are the only peopl...
^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tor than those of teachers for two bases
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 13.8261648746 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 290.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16551724138 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64476239636 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475862068966 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 290.0 20.1344086022 1440% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1498.0 100.406767564 1492% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 290.0 20.6045352989 1407% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 54.0 5.45110844103 991% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42732186708 0.236089414692 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.42732186708 0.076458572812 559% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29789075244 0.150856017488 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058425372521 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 147.9 11.7677419355 1257% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -222.87 58.1214874552 -383% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 116.4 10.1575268817 1146% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.19 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.4 8.01818996416 267% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 10.002688172 580% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 118.0 10.0537634409 1174% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.247311828 566% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.