The ability to adapt or adjust to the changing condition is more important than excellent knowledge in a job.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people think that excellent knowledge is more important than the ability to adapt or adjust to the changing condition in a job. However, I think the capability of adaptation or adjustment to changing condition is more critical than knowledge. So, I agree with the statement for three reasons.
First of all, reputation plays an important role for workers in a job, and the ability to adjust to the changing condition can help workers gain a higher reputation. For example, when I was a research assistant at Academia Sinica, I usually help professor do the project on lithium batteries with some researchers. To be more specific, I usually adjusted the experimental parameters based on the different environments, such as moisture or concentration, and the experimental result was great frequently. Therefore, I was respected by my coworkers due to my ability to adjust. However, if I only had the knowledge but no adjustment, my experiment would not succeed and I might be looked down by other people. Apparently, the ability to adjust is important in a job.
Secondly, confidence also plays a vital role for people in a work, and the capability to adapt to this kind of condition can allow people to obtain a sense of achievement. For example, my friend, Mike, an engineer at TSMC, worked in a stressful environment. Furthermore, he also met a lot of different situations, such as the clients’ complaints or sudden presentations to his boss, but he adapted to the stressful environment fastly and solved these problems well. As a result, he gained a sense of accomplishment from his work. Yet, if Mike only had excellent knowledge in the work, he might feel pressure on interacting with annoyed clients and bosses and lose his confidence. Obviously, the ability to adapt can help people build confidence.
Promotion plays a crucial role for people in the company, and the ability to adjust to the changing condition can provide people with more chances to promote. Take my father as an instance, when my father was an engineer at ASML 10 years ago, he solved a lot of problems with the ability. To be more specific, under any awful circumstances, he can adjust the unfunctional parts on the instruments immediately and produce walfers flawlessly. Consequently, he was promoted to manager after working only for one year. Nonetheless, if my father only had knowledge of instruments, he might only indicate the theories but not understand how to operate the machines when the changing parameters of machines happened. Hence, the ability to adjust is more vital than knowledge.
In conclusion, I think that prestige, confidence, and promotion are important for me. Therefore, I agree that the ability to adapt or adjust on the changing condition is more vital than excellent knowledge in a job.
- A city is trying to decide what to do with a large building that has become available in order to make it useful for city residents Which ONE of the following solutions would you recommend Why 1 Develop the building into housing for people who have low in 73
- The ability to adapt or adjust to the changing condition is more important than excellent knowledge in a job Do you agree or disagree with this statement 70
- TPO25 In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line The vessels were about 2 200 years old Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
- It is important for everyone to know about what is happening all around the world even though the events have not affected our daily life Do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2351.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06681034483 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07893138645 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439655172414 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.267136295 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.217391304 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1739130435 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.34782608696 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390399629759 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135596401164 0.076458572812 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153597951956 0.0737576698707 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298947274613 0.150856017488 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173250928924 0.0645574589148 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2351.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06681034483 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07893138645 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439655172414 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.267136295 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.217391304 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1739130435 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.34782608696 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390399629759 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135596401164 0.076458572812 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153597951956 0.0737576698707 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298947274613 0.150856017488 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173250928924 0.0645574589148 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.